• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparison of Outcomes Between the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and an Emergency General Surgery Registry at a Military Medical Center

Comparison of Outcomes Between the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and an Emergency General Surgery Registry at a Military Medical Center

Robert W Despain, MD1, William J Parker, MD1, Angela T Kindvall, BSN2, Peter A Learn, MD1, Eric A Elster, MD1, Elliot M Jessie, MD1, Carlos J Rodriguez, DO3, Matthew J Bradley, MD1. 1Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 2Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 3John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, TX

Objective: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has become the gold standard for assessing practice improvement in surgery. At our tertiary military hospital, we implemented an emergency general surgery (EGS) registry to actively track and review 100% of EGS cases. NSQIP abstracts 20% of cases in our institution. We compared our EGS registry to the NSQIP data. We hypothesize NSQIP may not fully represent EGS cases and outcomes.

Methods: A formal EGS Process Improvement Program, complete with a full registry, was implemented in 2016. From 2016 to 2018, the four most common EGS procedures were queried in the registry which included appendectomy, cholecystectomy, surgery for small bowel obstruction (SBO), and hernia repair. The CPT codes for these cases were used to identify cases within the NSQIP database and the EGS cases were identified from that search. Case volume and outcomes were compared between the EGS registry and the cases abstracted by NSQIP.

Results: In 2016, the EGS registry identified 128 cases with 15 (12%) patients having a complication. 53% (8/15) were associated with complications from surgery for SBO. NSQIP abstracted 14% (18/128) of EGS cases with 17% (3/18) patients having a complication, all related to cholecystectomies. These three complications were not considered adverse events within the EGS registry. Two of the complications were a hospital readmission for a medical problem unrelated to cholecystectomy and the third was a negative ERCP for a possible retained common bile duct stone. In 2017, the EGS registry identified 93 cases with 11 (12%) patients having a complication. The majority (7/11, 64%) of complications were associated with surgery for SBO.  NSQIP abstracted 22% (20/93) of EGS cases with zero patients having a complication. In 2018, the EGS registry identified 79 cases, with nine (11%) patients having a complication.  67% (6/9) of complications were related to cholecystectomies. NSQIP abstracted 15% (12/79) of EGS cases with zero patients having a complication. Within the three years, one patient was abstracted by NSQIP as not having an adverse event, however, within the EGS registry this patient was found to have an unplanned ICU admission for diabetic ketoacidosis following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Conclusion: NSQIP did not adequately capture EGS outcomes. In two of the three years, NSQIP did not identify a single complication from EGS cases. Resources should be allocated to improve the NSQIP rate of abstraction. Alternatively, institutions should implement an EGS Process Improvement Program complete with a registry.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94114

Program Number: MSS15

Presentation Session: Full-Day Military Surgical Symposium – General Surgery Presentations

Presentation Type: MSSPodium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search