• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparative Analysis of Myofascial Medialization Following Anterior versus Posterior Component Separation in a Cadaveric Model

Comparative Analysis of Myofascial Medialization Following Anterior versus Posterior Component Separation in a Cadaveric Model

Arnab Majumder, MD1, Luis Martin-Del-Campo, MD1, Heidi J Miller, MD2, Dina Podolsky, MD3, Hooman Soltanian, MD1, Yuri W Novitsky, MD, FACS3. 1University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 2University of New Mexico, 3Columbia University

Background: Component separation during ventral hernia repair remains an integral step during abdominal wall reconstruction. Although a multitude of techniques have been described, anterior component separation (ACS) via external oblique release (EOR) and posterior component separation (PCS) via transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR), are commonly utilized. However, the extent of myofascial medialization after ACS vs PCS has not been elucidated well to date. We aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of myofascial medialization of ACS vs PCS in an established cadaveric model.

Methods: Fifteen cadavers underwent both traditional ACS via EOR and PCS via TAR. Following midline laparotomy (MLL), baseline myofascial elasticity was measured. Subsequent steps for ACS included creation of subcutaneous flaps (SQF), external oblique release (EOR), and posterior sheath release (PRR). For PCS, steps included retrorectus dissection (RRD), transversus abdominis muscle division (TAD), and subsequent retromuscular dissection (RMD). Medial advancement of anterior rectus fascia (ARF) was measured following application of 2.5lbs, 5.0lbs, and maximal tension to the fascial edge as a whole, and separately at upper, middle, and lower abdominal segments. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Values are represented as average myofascial medialization in centimeters.

Results: Following MLL an average of 5.0±0.9cm (range 3.4-6.0cm) of baseline myofascial medialization was obtained. Complete ACS via EOR provided a maximum of 8.8±1.2cm (range 6.3-10.4cm) of ARF advancement compared to 10.2±1.7cm (range 7.6-12.9cm) seen with PCS via TAR, p<0.05. In the upper and mid abdomen, we noted an increase in ARF advancement with PCS compared to ACS (8.1±1.4cm vs 6.7±1.6cm and 11.4±1.5 vs 9.6±1.4cm, respectively). In the lower abdomen we noted similar levels of advancement between ACS and PCS, 8.7±1.8cm vs 9.1±1.7cm.

Conclusions: Component separation via anterior and posterior approaches provide substantial myofascial advancement during ventral hernia repairs. In our cadaveric model, we noted significant increases in anterior fascial medialization after PCS vs ACS as a whole, especially in the upper and mid abdomen. We advocate PCS as a reliable and possibly superior alternative for linea alba restoration for reconstructive repairs, especially for large defects in the upper and mid-abdomen. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 92356

Program Number: S032

Presentation Session: Complex Abdominal Wall Hernia

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search