• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Can Statistical Process Control (SPC) to Drive Improvement in Length of Stay After Colorectal Surgery?

Can Statistical Process Control (SPC) to Drive Improvement in Length of Stay After Colorectal Surgery?

Thais Reif, MD, Deborah S Keller, MS, MD, Guanying Yu, MD, Haiqing Zhang, MD, Laura Hyde, MD, Ahmed Al-Mazrou, MD, Ravi P Kiran, MD. Columbia University Medical Center

Background: New methods of improving surgical quality are needed. A key quality outcome measure is lengthof stay(LOS), as it’s linked to complications and costs. A novel method to reduce LOS is to apply Statistical Process Control(SPC) to identify process measures- specific institutional practices that lead to an outcome measure- related to outliers from the mean. SPC uses statistical methods to monitor and control a process, reducing variation and improving quality. Our goal was to determine if SPC can be used to identify outliers, patterns for outliers, and and their impact on quality outcome measures in elective colorectal surgery. 

Methods: Review of a prospective divisional database was performedfor elective colorectal procedures using an abdominal approach from 1/1/13-5/1/2018. Univariate analysis was performed to identify outliers, and compare the demographic, operative, and outcome variables acrossoutliers and non-outliers. Control charts were used to display the data graphically and analyze the process performance of LOS over time. The upper and lower control limits were setat +/-1 standard deviation(SD) from the mean. 

Results: 1,097 consecutive patients were evaluated. The overall mean LOS was 6.6 days(SD 4.4), giving control limits of 11 and 2. There were 115 LOS outliers. The mean outlier LOS was 21.4(SD 12.6). The process of LOS was unstable, with large deviations from the mean. However, the rate of outliers annually and their spread around the mean was consistent across years. Outliers had comparable age, gender, BMI, albumin, primary diagnosis, and procedure performed to non-outliers, but significantly greater co-morbidities and higher rates of previous abdominal surgery(both p<0.05).  LOS outliers had significantly higher rates of intraoperative complications(23.5%), post-operative complications(81.7%), post-discharge complications(19.1%), unplanned reoperations(20.8%), readmissions(26.0%), and use of post-discharge nursing facilities(21.7%) than non-outliers(all p<0.05). 

Conclusions: Using SPC, outliers for LOS and the trends over time were easily identified. The number of outliers and spread of variation above the mean LOS remained stable over time. The outliers had a significant impact on quality outcome measures, with higher rates of complications, readmission, reoperation, and healthcare utilization. Being an outlier may be a marker of a sicker patient. Regardless, there are consistent patterns for these LOS outliers, and the current “one-size fits all approach” may not be the best fit for these complex patients. With this, further work can focus on developing models to identify the process measures predictive of a prolonged LOS outcome measure, and proactively developing cost-effective care practices


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 94997

Program Number: P338

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

88

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals