• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Artificial Pneumothorax During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Artificial Pneumothorax During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Yosuke Izumi, MD PhD, Tairo Ryotokuji, MD, Akinori Miura, MD, Tsuyoshi Kato, Hiroshi Sato, MD, Kohei Kimura, MD. Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer is increasingly being used with increasing skills and experience and advances of endoscopic technology such as high-resolution endoscopic system. The surgical requirement for thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a good view of the mediastinum. The esophagus is at the bottom of the operative field when the patients is in the lateral decubitus position. The view tends to be obscured by the lung especially when approaching the lower mediastinum. Artificial pneumothorax (AP), insufflating carbon dioxide gas(CO2), actively promotes lung collapse either during two-lung ventilation or one-lung ventilation. Older studies demonstrated negative hemodynamic effects on annimals. Complications are clinically insignificant if CO2 is used judiciously. Bilateral AP happens during MIE, but there has been no study on hemodynamic effect due to bilateral AP.
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of AP during MIE and also investigate optimum anesthesia during AP or bilateral AP.
Methods: Our current technique consists of hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric dissection under pneumoperitoneum, mediastinoscopic dissection of the middle and lower esophagus under bilateral AP and a right thoracoscopic approach for mobilization of the intrathoracic esophagus and lymph node dissection in the paratracheal region under AP. 10 operations were performed under AP using CO2 at 8-10mmHg. The end-tidal CO2 pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure and heart rate were monitored. Mean airway pressure, tidal volume and respiration rate were recorded. Measurements were determined at base line, at the time approaching the mediastinum under pneumoperitoneum, at the initiation of one-lung ventilation and at the end of one-lung ventilation.
Results: The insufflation of CO2 of 8-10mmHg had no significant effect on the end-tidal CO2 pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure and heart rate. Mean arterial pressure had a trend to decrease. Mean airway pressure significantly rose from 10 to 20mmHg. Minute volume was required to raise up to about 30% over usual volume. Both lung were collapsed from laparoscopic view and membranous part of trachea caved in from thoracoscopic view during increased airway pressure, so barotraumas could not possibly happen. No complicatins were noted, associated with bilateral AP.
Conclusion: Artificial pneumothorax with CO2 during MIE did not have adverse hemodynamic effects in the clinical setting. Further investigation is required for more precise data.
 


Session: Emerging Technology Poster
Program Number: ETP018
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals