• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Are Minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) Trocars of 2mm and 3 mm Without Valve and Sealing Membrane a Viable Option?

Are Minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) Trocars of 2mm and 3 mm Without Valve and Sealing Membrane a Viable Option?

GUSTAVO L CARVALHO, MD PhD, ADRIANO C SALES, STUDENT, JOSÉ SÉRGIO S SILVA, STUDENT, REBECA G ROCHA, STUDENT, DIEGO L LIMA, STUDENT, FLÁVIO A JÚNIOR, MD. UNIPECLIN, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Pernambuco; Recife; Brazil

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to verify the usefulness of a new model of minilaparoscopy trocar that do not have a valve or sealing membranes and therefore have a much better ratio of dynamic friction. It is well known that with a lower friction the stress of surgical movements decreases and the precision increases. There was a doubt whether the lack of valve and sealing membrane would impair the use of trocars due to the large amount of gas leak.

METHOD: Two experiments were conducted: A) In Vitro – The loss of gas was measured in a closed system. The system consisted of a gas inflator (15 l / min), a rubber ball and the 2mm and 3mm trocars, obliterated by their forceps. The pressures used were 10, 12 and 15 mmHg, in that order. Each test lasted 5 minutes and was repeated five times. Finally it was calculated the average per-minute gas loss. B – In Vivo: It was analyzed 28 patients who underwent laparoscopic (trocars of 5mm and 10mm) and minilaparoscopic (trocars of 2mm and 3mm) cholecystectomy in the University Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, Recife – PE, Brazil. The average of the total gas loss during the procedures was divided by the average operative time.

RESULTS: Experiment A: There was a significant difference between the leak of the 2mm and 3mm trocars at all tested pressures (p<0.0001). When subjected to a pressure of 12mmHg the 2mm had a leak = 0.09 l / min vs. 0.49 L / min of the 3mm trocar. The smallest leak happened to 10 mmHg: 0.08 l / min (2 mm) vs. 0.44 l / min (3mm). At 15mmHg, the loss was 0.11 l / min for the 2mm vs. 0.52 l / min for the 3mm. As it was expected, pressure and gas leak proved to be directly proportional. Experiment B: The average operative time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 34.9 min and the average gas loss was 123.3 liters, resulting in a loss of 3.5 l / min. On the other hand the average time of the minilaparoscopic cases were 25.8 min with an average gas loss of 95.7 liters, resulting in a leakage of 3.7 l / min (p=N.S.)

CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that the 2 and 3mm trocars without valves and sealing membranes are viable and very useful. The experiments showed that the gas loss does not differ much from traditional trocars with valves and sealing. Moreover, the absence of valves and membranes provides a much lower friction, improves trocar dynamics, resulting in much greater precision for surgical movements.


Session: Poster
Program Number: P433
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals