• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / An Assessment of Bio-Absorbable Mesh In High-Risk Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

An Assessment of Bio-Absorbable Mesh In High-Risk Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Omar Toubat, BA, Evan T Alicuben, MD, Kamran Samakar, MD, Namir Katkhouda, MD, Caitlin C Houghton, MD, John C Lipham, MD, Kulmeet Sandhu, MD, Adrian Dobrowolsky, MD, Nikolai A Bildzukewicz, MD. Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC

Introduction – Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with mesh placement is commonly performed in patients with complex ventral hernias. Recently, bio-absorbable mesh has emerged as an alternative to synthetic and biologic mesh types, however few studies have evaluated its efficacy in AWR.  The aim of this study was to describe our institutional experience with bio-absorbable mesh in a high-risk patient cohort.

Methods and Procedures – Patients who underwent incisional hernia repair with component separation and bio-absorbable mesh placement (Gore Bio-A or Bard Phasix) between 2013 and 2018 were identified. Demographic and surgical characteristics and relevant outcome data were retrospectively collected from patient records.

Results – In total, 50 patients (32 males, 64.0%) were included, with a mean age of 58.7 years and mean BMI of 30.7 (range 21.0-44.9). 9 (18.0%) patients had a modified Charlson-Deyo (CD) comorbidity score of 1 and 33 (66.0%) patients had a CD score of greater than 2.  9 (18.0%) patients had a history of wound infection.  Operative characteristics are summarized in Table 1.  The median LOS following surgery was 4 days (range 1-20).  The mean follow-up period after discharge was 8.9 months (range 0.4-39.4).  Postoperatively, 11 (22.0%) patients experienced at least one seroma, 14 (28.0%) had a surgical site infection, and 5 (10.0%) experienced surgical site bleeding/hematoma formation. Of the six patients that required surgical reintervention, 3 underwent surgical debridement, 2 underwent surgical repair for hernia recurrence, and 1 underwent both debridement and repair for recurrence.  Overall, 7 (14.0%) patients experienced a recurrence, with a mean time to recurrence of 1.3 years.  

Conclusion – Bio-absorbable mesh is an emerging alternative to synthetic and biologic mesh in incisional hernia repair.  The use of bio-absorbable mesh in conjunction with component separation is a durable approach for complex AWR.

Table 1
Characteristic Number
Surgical Status  
     Elective 48
     Emergent 2
Repair Type  
     Initial 27
     Recurrent 23
Mesh Placement  
     Onlay 19
     Underlay/Retrorectus 24
     Onlay and Underlay/Retrorectus 7
Component Separation  
     Bilateral Posterior 18
     Bilateral Anterior 17
     TAR 11
     Bilateral Posterior and Anterior 4

Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95531

Program Number: P530

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

116

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals