• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / An algorithmic approach to gastroesophageal reflux after vertical sleeve gastrectomy

An algorithmic approach to gastroesophageal reflux after vertical sleeve gastrectomy

Rami R Mustafa, MD, PhD1, Adel Alhaj Saleh, MD2, Mujjahid Abbas, MD1, Leena Khaitan, MD, MPH1. 1Cleveland Medical Center , University hospitals, 2Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center | TTUHSC · Department of Surgery

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common bariatric procedures worldwide.  This has led to a new problem: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve.  A common approach to this problem is conversion to gastric bypass, even in those who are no longer obese.  This study aims to establish a new algorithm with multiple options to manage GERD after Sleeve Gastrectomy based upon patient physiology.

Methods: From January, 2012 to December, 2017, 602 patients underwent LSG and 53 underwent evaluation for persistent GERD after sleeve that did not respond to high dose of PPI’s.  All patients had evaluation with EGD, esophagram, esophageal motility and pH monitoring.  Demographic data, BMI and symptoms were evaluated and algorithm applied.  Procedures, medication use and symptoms were followed for at least one year postoperatively.  Patients with BMI>35 or abnormal sleeve morphology had conversion to gastric bypass (GB). Patients with normal sleeve morphology and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) received LES augmentation. Those with normal LES pressure (LESP) and normal weight received radiofrequency energy delivery (RF). All hiatal hernias (HH) were fixed. The primary symptoms measured were heartburn and regurgitation. Data is analyzed by SPSS and reported. 

Results: Mean age was 53 ±13 yrs, (82% white, 80 % female) and BMI was 36 ±9 kg/m2. 31 (58.4%) patients underwent conversion to GB with mean LES pressure of 25.25 mmHg ± 14 (24 also had hiatal hernia (HH) repair). 13 cases (24.5%) received LES augmentation and had mean LESP of 11.5 mmHg (SD± 7.7). 7 patients (13.2%) only had HH repair. 2 (3.7%) underwent RF and had mean LESP of 25 mmHg. 43 (81%) of patients had  HH repair (24 of which were concomitant with GB and 12 with LES augmentation). 85% of patients in the GB group (BMI 46.26±14.9)  had no symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation at 2.5 year follow up(BMI 33±8.9) In the LES augmentation group, 12/13 (92%) patients had resolution of symptoms and stopped PPI’s immediately after procedure. BMI at time of surgery 30± 7 kg/m2 and remained stable at 2 yr follow up (30.7±7.3).  The RF ablation groups and hiatal hernia group all had resolution of symptoms at 1-3 year follow up.

Conclusions: Multiple options for management of reflux after LSG are available.  Excellent outcomes can be achieved when procedures are chosen based on patient physiology and a thorough evaluation of the patient’s reflux disease. 

Keywords:  sleeve gastrectomy. GERD. PH monitoring.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95093

Program Number: S137

Presentation Session: Bariatric V – GERD and Esophageal Physiology

Presentation Type: Podium

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search