• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Surgical Wound Drain Containing an Antimicrobial Coating

A Surgical Wound Drain Containing an Antimicrobial Coating

Todd Meyer, PhD, Melissa Kelsey, BS. Bacterin International, Inc.

Objective
The pronounced incidence of device-associated infections has numerous causes and many corresponding potential solutions. Among these solutions is the coating of externally communicating devices with antimicrobial agents, with the objective of slowing or stopping transfer of exogenous flora from the skin to the interior of a wound. After a surgical procedure, a wound drain is frequently placed within the wound and through an exit site to facilitate discharge of serosanguinous fluid via suction. As is the case with any such catheter, skin flora have access to the wound along the length of the drain. Given sufficient levels of microorganism migration, colonization, and growth, an infection can result. A potential measure to prevent migration of flora along the catheter is a coating containing an antimicrobial agent such as silver sulfadiazine. Such a coating would be expected to significantly decrease the number of microorganisms present on the drain surface. Herein, such a coating is applied to a wound drain and tested for antimicrobial activity with the objective of observing antimicrobial efficacy versus an uncoated wound drain.
Description
Channel style silicone wound drains (Parker Hannifin, Merrillville, IN) were cleaned and oxidized via oxygen plasma treatment, followed by further plasma treatment to enhance surface characteristics. Following plasma treatment, the drains were coated with a poly(vinyl) alcohol coating containing silver sulfadiazine, followed by cross linking via acetal formation and curing. The drains were then packaged and sterilized via gamma irradiation, followed by two different types of antimicrobial testing.
Results
Antimicrobial activity was tested using the standard Kirby-Bauer method, by pressing cross-sections of drains into Mueller Hinton agar inoculated with various organisms and observing zones of inhibition versus positive and negative controls after incubation for 16 hours. Additionally the exterior portions of the drains were removed to test coating of the channels. All coated wound drain segments showed considerable zones of inhibition, ranging from 11 – 21 mm for the full drain segments, and significantly, as high as 7 mm for the segments containing the interior channel portion only.
Time-kill studies were performed in the following manner. Both coated and uncoated wound drain segments were immersed in a nutrient solution composed of 2% tryptic soy broth (TSB) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) contaminated with approximately 106 colony forming units (CFU)/mL of the following organisms: S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans. Following incubation at 25 °C, aliquots were removed at days 3, 5, and 7, diluted, plated, and enumerated. Results show a minimum 4 log reduction for the coated drains versus uncoated controls.
Conclusions
A wound drain containing a hydrogel coating with silver sulfadiazine showed pronounced efficacy against common pathogenic organisms versus an uncoated control drain. The results also demonstrate continued release of silver sulfadiazine throughout the test period.


Session: Emerging Technology Poster
Program Number: ETP087
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals