• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Matched Case-Controlled Study of Single Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Patients in a Single U.S. Center with 1 Year Follow-Up

A Matched Case-Controlled Study of Single Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Patients in a Single U.S. Center with 1 Year Follow-Up

S. VITHIANANTHAN, MD, D GERO, MD, J Zhang, BS, J T Machan, M Vera, md. Department of Surgery, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Miriam Hospital Providence RI and Service de Chirurgie Générale, Hôpital du Chablais, Monthey, Switzerland

INTRODUCTION
Single incision laparoscopic gastric banding (SIL-GB) has been reported to be safe and feasible. This matched case-control study is the first to compare the outcome in weight loss and comorbidity improvement of single versus conventional laparoscopic gastric banding with 1 year follow-up.

METHOD
Patients undergoing gastric banding surgery by one surgeon (SV) were prospectively entered into a database. Data collected included basic demographics, perioperative parameters, early and late postoperative morbidity, weight loss and phi angle. Ten patients who underwent a single incision gastric banding procedure were matched one-to-two with 20 patients undergoing conventional gastric banding from the database of 151 patients. Match was obtained according to gender, BMI ±4, age ±8, and presence of at least one comorbidity in common. Generalized linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS
Patients´ preoperative characteristics:

SIL n=10

mean±std

Conventional n=20

mean± std

sex (m:f) 9:10 18:20
age(years) 36.5 ±10 37.5 ± 9
Preop BMI 41.8± 4 42.4 ± 3
Weight (kg) 110.2 ± 13 117.9 ±13
OR time (min) 106.6 ±24 100.9 ± 22
Hosp stay (d) 1 1

We found no significant differences in patients BMI and excess weight loss (EWL) during the 1 year follow-up.

months SIL BMI CONVENTIONAL BMI P VALUE
1.5 38.4 39.0 0.40
3 36.65 38.35 0.28
6 36.69 37.25 0.72
12 34.35 36.71 0.21

Major complications did not occur in the cohorts, rate of minor complications (wound infection, postoperative obstruction) was comparable between SIL-GB and conventional GB, 10% and 15% respectively. The position of the gastric band (phi angle- angle between spinous process and the long axis of the band) showed no significant difference between the two groups.

time SIL (degres) Conventional (degrees)
Phi angle at day 1 62 ± 13 59± 15
phi angle at 1.5 monthspostop 55 ± 9 54 ± 11

Conclusion
In our matched case controlled study, Single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery outcomes are similar to the conventional multi-trocar laparoscopic operation. Even when comparing the angle the of the band there were no statistical differences in both techniques. It is noteworthy that in both groups we noticed a “settling” effect of the angle, where the phi-angle decreased in angulation after 6 weeks.


Session: SS12
Program Number: S069

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals