• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Achalasia

First submitted by:
David McClusky
Category
Esophagus
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Introduction

Achalasia is an esophageal disorder of unknown cause characterized by apertistalsis of the esophageal body and non-relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). First description is found in 1674, by Sir Thomas Willis. A sponge tipped whale bone was used by a patient to push food down after each meal. The term achalasia was coined by Hurst and Rake (1929) and is Latin for “Failure to relax”, though Von Mikulicz had suggested cardiospasm as the cause in 1981.

Achalasia is an uncommon disease occurring in 5-10 per 100,000 population. Most commonly adults are affected with mean age being 40-50 years. Idiopathic achalasia, found in the northern America closely mimics “Chagas Disease of the esophagus” occurring in South America.

 

Pathophysiology

Anatomic alterations

Abnormalities in all neuromuscular components of the esophagus and its central nervous connection have been described but a pathogonomic defect remains elusive. Vagal and Doral Motor Nerve Center degeneration is thought to be secondary phenomenon. Most consistently present is the inflammatory reaction with destruction of ganglionic cells in the myenteric plexus in the esophageal wall. There is progressive decrease in number of ganglionic cells with a more advanced disease indicating the loss may later in disease. There is smooth muscle hypertrophy with fibrosis and liquifactive necrosis is thought to be secondary, as is chronic mucosal changes due to irritation by the retained food in the distal esophagus. These changes result in increase incidence of SCC in patients with achalasia.

Physiologic alterations

In healthy esophagus the smooth muscle contraction and resting LES tone is maintained by excitatory cholinergic innervation. To allow peristalsis inhibitory NO/VIP mediated smooth muscle inhibition is generated in response to swallow. The key abnormality in achalasia is impairment of the post- ganglionic neurons to the smooth circular muscle.

 

Etiology

Genetic theory

86 families have been described but accounts for 1-2% of all patients.

Infectious theory

Possibly a neuro-trophic infectious cause. Herpes virus seems to be most plausible except that they are not uniformly identified. In Chagas disease the cause is Trypanosoma cruzi.

Autoimmune theory

50% patients have anti-bodies and the inflammatory response seen in the esophageal wall is T-cell mediated.

Degenerative theory

some suggestion that in a small percentage of patients, especially the elderly, achalasia is a result of degenerative neurological disorder.

 

Clinical Presentation

Overview

Mean duration of symptoms is 4.6 Yrs (1mth to 67Yrs)

  1. Patients adapt to slowly worsening symptomatology and present late in the disease progression
  2. Delay in diagnosis due to lack of physician understanding of esophageal motility disorders exacerbates the late presentation
  3. This is frequently confused with GERD and treated as such for a long period of time prior to presentation

 

Common Symptoms

  • Dysphagia:  This is the most frequent complaint.  Liquids are often worse than solids.  Usually slowly progressive with weight loss only in advanced disease.  Often the patient presents with a history of being the last to finish a meal.  Frequently patients report having to use a Valsalva maneuver to force food into the stomach.
  • Regurgitation:  Presents in 75% of patients.  Patients can often tell what is regurgitated as the food is undigested.  There is a history of chronic saliva, mucous spitting, and drooling on the pillow at night.
  • Chest pain:  Presents in 40% of patients.  Patients are often younger with a poor and unpredictable response to dilation or surgical therapy.
  • Heartburn:  Presents in approximately 33% of patients.  This is due to undigested food and/or in situ production from fermentation of an uncleared food bolus.  This is unresponsive to acid suppression usually hours after eating.
  • Weight loss:  50-60% of patients show a slight weight loss usually late in the disease progression.  If weight loss if significant, malignancy should be suspected.
  • Megaesophagus:  6 cm dilation of the esophagus with tortuosity.

 

Diagnostic Testing

  • Upright Chest X-ray:  Widened mediastinum, air-fluid level in the mediastinum, absence of a gastric air bubble
  • Barium Swallow (with fluoroscopy):  this is the single best diagnostic test
  1. No peristalsis, possible simultaneous contractions
  2. Poor clearance (normal < 1 minute)
  3. Bird beak tapering of the LES (smooth narrowing)
  4. Irregular shadow on the top of the barium level:  due to food and liquid in the esophagus
  5. Esophageal dilation (sigmoid esophagus in late stages)
  • Esophageal Manometry:  this it the gold standard for diagnosis
  1. Aperistalsis of the esophageal body (especially in the distal 2 channels), also called simultaneous waves/non-propulsive waves
  2. Body pressure usually less than 40 mmHg.  If > 40 mmHg then this is called “vigorous achalasia”
  3. Hypertensive non-relaxing LES
  4. Esophageal pressurization (the baseline does not return to below gastric zero level after the catheter has been withdrawn into the esophagus).  This is due to retained food and fluid in the esophagus
  5. Inability to advance catheter into the stomach with the possibility of needing an EGD to advance the catheter
  • Endoscopy:  This is always done to rule out other causes of the patients symptomatology (e.g. malignancy)
  1. Dilated fluid-filled esophagus
  2. Tortuosity
  3. Thickened mucosa with friability
  4. Difficult to negotiate LES
  5. Normal LES on retroflexion view
  • EUS/CT Scan:  used to rule out pseudo-achalasia

 

Treatment Options

The goal of treatment is to improve esophageal clearance.

Medical Therapy

Nitrates and Calcium channel blockers.  These are used to relax a hypertensive LES

Botulinum Toxin

BTX administration to the esophagus results in paralysis of the LES with a decreased resistance and increased clearance

  • Technique:  100 U (4 divided doses) injected intramuscularly in the LES (1 cm above the squamo-columnar junction)
  1. 75-90% first time response
  2. 50% effect after 6 months
  3. Repeat injections are possible but progressively less helpful
  4. Repeat injections are reserved for those unfit or unwilling to undergo surgery
  5. Use in pseudo-achalasia to differentiate from classical achalasia
  6. Reports of increased risk for mucosal perforation if myotomy is required later

Pneumatic Dilation

This is the oldest known therapy and was first introduced in 1898.

  • Technique:  Rigiflex dilator (3.0, 3.5, 4.0 cm sizes) done under fluoroscopy
  1. 2-3% full thickness perforation
  2. 50-85% symptom control at 5 years
  3. Frequent need for repeat dilations
  4. Progressive decrease in symptom control over longer periods

Surgical Cardiomyotomy (Heller myotomy)

First described by Heller in 1913 as trans-thoracic double myotomy (anterior and posterior), and subsequently modified to single long anterior-lateral myotomy by Zajjer (1923) has remained the standard of surgical intervention till mid 1990’s.
Pelligrini has been a pioneer in applying minimally invasive technique to the procedure and has evolved the extent of myotomy and need for fundoplication since 1990’s to now.
First reported change was use of left VATS (thoracoscopic) (1992) while maintaining a long esophageal myotomy with only minimal extension (0.5cm) on to the stomach. Reports of 80% relief of dysphagia with 42% GERD symptoms.
To decrease dysphagia the myotomy needed to be extended more on to the stomach. Hence conversion to trans-abdominal (laparoscopic) method. Initially 1.5-2 cm on to the stomach with a Dor fundoplication (1994) to prevent reflux (also the anterior fundoplication helps protect the mucosa). Since then this group has further changed to extend the myotomy 3 cm on to the stomach and use a Toupet fundoplication (1998) for anti-reflux. 95-90% relief with 13% GERD.

If Megaesophagus is encountered, treatment is either via a Heller myotomy (some have reported poor surgical outcomes) or an esophagectomy at experienced centers.

Recurrent Symptoms after previous myotomy

Previous thoracic myotomy

  • Recurrent dysphagia with or without GERD
  • Dilated distal esophagus
  • Perform an extended myotomy onto the stomach with fundoplication if dysphagia is the primary symptom
  • Esophagectomy a good option, but trans-thoracic mobilization might be needed

Previous Laparoscopic myotomy

  • Due to either an incomplete myotomy, refibrosis, or obstruction due to fundoplication
  • Redo Heller myotomy with fundoplication is treatment of choice
  • If needed a transhiatal esophagectomy is also a good option

 

References

1. Vaezi MF, Richter JE.Current Therapies for Achalasia: Comparisonand efficacy. J Cli Gastroenterolo 1998;27:21-35.
2. Richter JE. Achalasia. The Esophagus 4th ed. Lippincot, Williams and Wilkins. Eds. Castell, Richter.
3, Oelschlager BK, Eubanks TR, Pelligrini CA. Surgery for esophageal motor disorders. The Esophagus 4th ed. Lippincot, Williams and Wilkins. Eds. Castell, Richter.

Note:  This material has been obtained with permission from the 2008 SAGES Annual Meeting Post-Graduate Education Motility Misery Session, and is taken from Dr. Sumeet Mittal’s lecture on Achalasia.  The author acknowledges Drs. Mittal, Park, Oelschlager, and Eubanks for their contributions and leadership during the 2008 SAGES Annual Meeting and the Motility Misery Post-Graduate Education Session.

2,419

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

Category: Esophagus
  • Main Page
  • Help
  • Create a New Wiki

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons