Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Management of Small Bowel Obstruction


Presented by James P Byrne, BScEng, MD at the SAGES 2014 Meeting; Panel – Concurrent Session SS1 MIS/Solid Organ

results cohort breakdown –2:10
results patient characteristics–2:33
results complications–2:57
results multivariable analysis–3:39
results com

Keyword(s): acute care laparoscopy, acute care surgery, adhesiolysis, adhesions, adhesive SBO, adverse event, baseline characteristics, benefits, blood transfusion, cohort breakdown, common surgical problem, comparison, complications, controversy, conversion rate, converted to open, criteria, death, electronic patient record, emergency surgery, endpoints, flatus, high ASA classification, hospitalizations, intention-to-treat analysis, intraop details, laparoscopic, laparoscopic approach, laparoscopic completion, laparoscopic technique, laparoscopy, M&M, mean BMI, mean operative time, MIS, morbidity, multivariable logistic regression, NG removal, NG tube, no significant difference, open adhesiolysis, open surgery, open surgical management, outcomes, patient characteristics, postop LOS, postop outcomes, postop pneumonia, predictors of conversion, preop investigations, primary endpoint, prior abdominal surgery, recovery time, reduction, reduction in adverse outcomes, reintubation, retrospective observational study design, retrospective study design, return to GI function, safety, scientific committee, secondary endpoint, secondary outcomes, selection bias, septic shock, significant difference, single institution, SIRS, study limitations, successful laparoscopic completion, surgical admissions, surgical blood loss, transition zone, univariate analyses, variables

Video Uploaded By:
James Paul Byrne
Uploaded on
Video Categories
Learning Themes
Presentation Types
Video Authors
Video Institutions

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reset A Lost Password