• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Wound Complications After Inguinal Hernia Repair, Has Robotic Surgery Improved Outcomes?

Carla N Holcomb, MD, MSPH1, Li-Ching Huang2, Savannah Renshaw1, Susan Maurer, MD1, Noah Switzer, MD1, Michael Meara, MD1, Courtney Collins, MD1, Vimal Narula, MD1, Benjamin Poulose, MD1. 1Ohio State University Medical Center, 2University of Vanderbilt

Introduction: Minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery has been associated with lower surgical site infections compared to open surgery. However, there is speculation that the preperitoneal approach may lead to higher rates of seroma formation.  Robotic assisted inguinal surgery has become increasingly popular yet it is unclear if this approach is an improvement on the standard open Lichtenstein repair in terms of surgical site complications.  The purpose of this study was to compare surgical site complication rates after robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair(rTAPP) of inguinal hernias to open Lichtenstein hernia repair(oIHR). 

Methods: The study consisted of multi-institutional data from patients undergoing elective, non-recurrent inguinal hernia repair with either rTAPP or oIHR in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative from 2013-2018.  Outcomes of interest included surgical site occurrence (SSO), which is a composite variable of surgical site infection, skin or soft tissue ischemia, wound drainage, seroma, or hematoma. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square analysis was used for categorical variables.

Results: The study population consisted of 1170 inguinal hernia repairs including 540 rTAPP (46%) and 630 oIHR (54%).  Patients that underwent oIHR were more likely to be older (65 years [55-73 years] vs 60 years[48-70 years], p=0.01) and have higher rates of diabetes mellitus (11% vs 8%), p=0.06) compared to rTAPP.   There was no significant difference between groups regarding hernia size (rTAPP 2.0cm[1.0-5.0cm] vs oIHR 2.0cm[1.6-3.0cm], p=0.84).  Overall SSO rates were low at 2.8%(n=33) and did not significantly differ by rTAPP(2%) vs oIHR(3%), p=0.14.   The most common SSO in both groups was seroma but this was not significantly different in either group(1.6% for rTAPP versus 1.4% for oIHR p=0.17).  There was no significant difference in any postoperative complication (5% vs 5%), hernia recurrence (0.2% vs 0.0%) or 30 day readmission(1% vs 1%) for rTAPP vs oIHR, respectively.

257

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2019 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons