• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Utility and Accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound As a Diagnostic and Staging Tool for the Evaluation of Mediastinal Adenopathy

Utility and Accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound As a Diagnostic and Staging Tool for the Evaluation of Mediastinal Adenopathy

Rebecca J Johnson, MD, J E Stephenson, MD FACS, C Schammel, PhD, B L Johnson, MS, K Banks, S Hutcheson, W Wall, W D Bolton, MD. Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center

 

Objective of Study: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a technique for mediastinal evaluation which is less invasive than cervical mediastinoscopy, the traditional gold standard. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the utility and accuracy of EBUS as a diagnostic and staging tool at a regional teaching institution.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional thoracic surgery database for patients undergoing EBUS from August 2008 to March 2011. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon, using a linear probe endobronchial ultrasound and onsite immediate pathology interpretation as well as cell block tissue evaluation.
Results: 190 patients underwent EBUS: 90 (47%) patients underwent EBUS for diagnosis only; 73 (38%) for staging only; and 27 (14%) for both diagnosis and staging. Diagnoses obtained by diagnostic EBUS included non-small cell lung cancer- n=27 (23%); other cancer- n=24 (21%); sarcoid/granulomatous- n=8 (7%); benign lymphoid tissue- n=57 (49%); and was nondiagnostic in only 1 case (1%). For staging EBUS, 27 (37%) patients had malignancy found in the lymph node specimen, while 46 (63%) patients had benign lymph node tissue. 103 patients therefore had a benign result at the time of EBUS. Fifty-six (54%) of these patients underwent subsequent mediastinal lymph node dissection or mediastinoscopy for tissue confirmation with the remainder undergoing follow up surveillance chest CT scans. Two patients had a false negative EBUS, one patient with a false negative diagnostic EBUS and one with a false-negative staging EBUS. Both false negative studies sampled levels 4L, 4R, and 7, with each having only one station that was found to be positive for malignancy. The overall false negative rate was 2% for all benign results, and 4% for those benign results confirmed with lymph node dissection or mediastinoscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic EBUS was 97% and 100%. The sensitivity and specificity for staging EBUS was 98% and 100%. In those patients undergoing a staging EBUS, a mean of 2.6 nodal stations were sampled, with 71% (n=73) of these patients having three lymph node stations sampled and 29% (n=30) had two lymph node stations sampled. The mass itself was sampled in eight patients.
Conclusion: We found endobronchial ultrasound to be a highly accurate and minimally invasive manner in which to both diagnose mediastinal masses and stage the mediastinum for patients with non small cell lung cancer.
 


Session Number: ResFel – Residents/Fellows Scientific Session
Program Number: S137

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search