• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Transgastric Approach Does Not Increase Postoperative Infections or Complications in Swine Uterine Horn Resection

Transgastric Approach Does Not Increase Postoperative Infections or Complications in Swine Uterine Horn Resection

Introduction
Doubts have been raised versus NOTES surgery concerning intra abdominal infectious complications. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative course in open, laparoscopic and transgastric surgery, specially concerning infections and postop well being in a randomized porcine survival study.
Methods & Procedures
30 landrace pigs were randomized to open, laparoscopic or NOTES (transgastric) uterine horn resection with a survival time of 4 weeks. All animals were prepared with liquid diet for 2 days and fasted for 12 hours prior to surgery. They received a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics, Cefuroxim, at start of the procedure. No washing of the stomachs was performed in the transgastric group. All surgical procedures were performed by trained surgeons, NOTES operations were performed by trained surgical endoscpists. Open and laparoscopic surgery was performed using standard surgical techniques. Transgastric surgery was performed using the Olympus R-scope together with conventional endoscopic accessories. The gastric access site was closed using TAS T-tags (Ethicon Endosurgery). Peritoneal fluid was sampled for bacterial culture at the time of peritoneal access, prior to closure and at post mortem. The operating time and the postop time till standing up and eating were recorded. During the first postop week temperature and weight were recorded daily. Blood samples were taken every other day during one week and then every week until post mortem. CRP was analysed using porcine specific ELISA.
Results
27 animals survived until euthanised at 4 weeks. Three animals, one from each group, were euthanized earlier; one due to a hoof infection, one omental bleeding, one abdominal wound dehiscence. The operating time was significantly longer in the NOTES-group, mean 124 min versus 35 min for lap surgery and 23 min for open surgery. However, the groups did not differ concerning postop time to standing up or eating, postop temperature or weight-gain.
At post mortem 3/9 animals in the open surgery group had wound infections and 2/9 in the laparoscopic group. No intra abdominal infections were recorded in either group and there was no significant difference in bacterial cultures at any time-point. The CRP was equal prior to surgery and at its conclusion, but at postop day one the NOTES group had significantly lower CRP than open or lap surgery. From day 3 until day 28 no differences were seen.
Conclusion
Despite a long operating time the transgastrically operated animals recovered just as quickly as the other animals and showed no infectious complications. The lower CRP at day 1 indicates a reduced stress response in the NOTES group.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S038

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search