• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Self-Approximating Translumenal Access Technique (stat) Reliably Permits Transgastric Organ Resection and Retrieval

The Self-Approximating Translumenal Access Technique (stat) Reliably Permits Transgastric Organ Resection and Retrieval

Introduction: Several studies have shown that the Self-Approximating Translumenal Access Technique (STAT) allows safe abdominal access and a reliable means of gastric closure for per-oral NOTES. Little is known, however, about the durability of the STAT tunnel under the mechanical forces required for organ resection and specimen retrieval. We hypothesized that simple extirpative abdominal operations (including specimen resection and retrieval) could be performed via STAT so that the tunnel would maintain its integrity for the conclusion of the procedure, permitting a secure gastrotomy closure.

Methods: 14 domestic swine (mean wt 26kg) underwent transgastric organ resection (7 cholecystectomy, 7 left uterine horn resection). Abdominal access was obtained using STAT (as previously described) with the submucosal tunnel directed at the target organ. The resected surgical specimen, a fully inflated 2 cm endoscopic balloon and an 8x3x3cm manufactured ‘standard specimen’ (a simulated human gallbladder with large gallstone) were sequentially retrieved through the submucosal tunnel. Evaluation of tunnel integrity and an assessment of the ease of specimen extraction were performed following each retrieval. Physiologic, operative and clinical data were collected. All procedures were video recorded. After a two-week observation period, animals were euthanized and necropsy performed for documentation of gross findings.

Results: The mean operative time was 4.1h (range 2.4-5.5hr). The mean abdominal access time (mucosal incision to serotomy) was 51min (range 26-78). A mean tunnel length of 12cm (6-23cm) with a width 4cm (2.5-5cm) was created. The STAT tunnel remained fully intact in: 14/14 after organ resection and retrieval, 13/13 after balloon extraction and 11/14 after standard specimen extraction. All three tears occurred early in our experience. Two small mucosal tears still permitted the STAT tunnel to be closed by standard endoscopic clip technique. One significant gastric tear required a single laparoscopic suture for secure closure. The ease in specimen extractions can be seen in Table 1. None of the standard specimens were able to be endoscopically delivered past the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ). Post-operatively all animals gained weight. One animal, sacrificed at post-operative day 12 due to lethargy, had a cystic duct leak and biloma. Other necropsy findings included: adhesions (4), bile leak (1), laparoscopic port site abscess (1), small submucosal abscess(1).

Type of

Specimen

No

Difficulty

Mild

Difficulty

Moderate

Difficulty

Severe

Difficulty

Surgical Specimen 14 0 0 0
Balloon 12 1 0 0
Standard Specimen 7 0 3

4 (Early Cases)

Conclusions: The submucosal tunnel created using STAT is capable of withstanding the mechanical forces of transgastric organ resection and retrieval. STAT also permitted the removal of rigid specimens (simulate large gallstone). None of these standard specimens could be delivered past the GEJ, suggesting that tunneling methods of transgastric access are not the size-limiting factor in per-oral specimen retrieval. One significant mucosal tear occurred early in the study, suggesting that there is a learning curve inherent in making the STAT tunnel wide enough to accommodate large, rigid specimens.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S068

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search