• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Relationship Between Post-operative Anatomy and Endoscopic Stent Migration

The Relationship Between Post-operative Anatomy and Endoscopic Stent Migration

Introduction
Endoscopic stents have been demonstrated to be safe and effective in treating complication of upper gastrointestinal surgery. However, stents placed tend to be unstable and have a significant rate of migration. It is unclear what factors influence stent stability and the ideal clinical application of this technology. We hypothesize that the shape of the post-surgical foregut anatomy will correlate with outcome and likelihood of migration.
Methods
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for all patients undergoing endoscopic stenting for post-operative complications of proximal anastomotic leak or stricture. Patients were assessed for etiology of disease, type of initial surgical procedure, location of complication, and type of stent deployed. Endpoints were technical success, operative time, intra- or post-operative complication, time to oral feeding, and length of stay.
Results
From July 2005 to July 2009, a total of 11 stents were deployed in 8 patients. Etiology of disease and types of procedure included: (1) morbidly obese patients who had undergone primary or revision roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 4) or sleeve gastrectomy (n = 2) and (2) gastric cancer patients who had undergone total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy (n = 2), including one patient that had adjuvant external beam radiation. Complications that were treated included anastomotic leak (n = 5) and stricture (n = 3). Stents placed were Polyflex Esophageal Stents (Boston Scientific, Natcik, MA) and Alimaxx-E stents (Alveolus, Charlotte, MC) ranging from 12-25 mm wide and 70-120 mm long. Mean operative time was 69 ± 43 minutes (range: 29-166 minutes). There were no perioperative complications other than stent migration. Primary technical success as evaluated by intra-operative fluoroscopy was achieved in all cases, although 5 patients redeveloped leaks due to stent migration; secondary success after stent repositioning or replacement was 88% (7/8 patients). Stent migration occurred in 1/4 patients after RYGB, 2/2 patients after sleeve gastrectomy, and 2/2 patients after total gastrectomy. Average time to oral feeding was 1.88 ± 1.13 days (range 1-4 days) and average post-operative length of stay was 5.44 ± 3.17 days (range: 1-10 days), although a single patient with severe complications from the initial operation never tolerated oral intake and expired in the hospital.
Discussion
The utility of endoscopic stenting for the management of post-operative leaks and strictures after foregut surgery has been well demonstrated, with a known high rate of migration. In our small series, stents placed after RYGB had a lower rate of migration than stents placed after partial or total gastrectomy either for morbid obesity or cancer. The caliber of the gastric pouch and gastrojejunostomy andplacement proximal to the anastamosis may better facilitate stent anchoring than the relatively loose anastamosis at the esophagojejunostomy and gastric sleeve staple line. Better understanding of the effect of anatomy on stent anchoring can potentially expand the role of stents to include other indications.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P374

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search