• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / The Impact of Cholangiography on 30-Day Readmissions After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The Impact of Cholangiography on 30-Day Readmissions After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Andrew Lambour, MD, Karissa Tauber, Jesse Columbo, MD, Byron F Santos, MD. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Background: The benefits of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been widely studied.  The impact on readmissions has yet to be fully determined.  We hypothesized that surgeon confidence in lack of bile duct injury or retained stones afforded with IOC could lead to a reduced readmission rate.

Methods: We reviewed all laparoscopic and laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy cases from September 2013 to August 2016 (n=772, mean age=54, %female=68%).  A comparison of cases performed with IOC (LC+IOC, n=428) was made to those without IOC (LC alone, n=344).  The primary outcome of interest was 30-day readmissions.  Readmissions were further evaluated to determine the cause for admission, the likelihood of being related to surgery, and the subsequent length of stay (LOS).  Secondary outcomes include 30-day mortality, 90-day major complications, 90-day minor complications, and 90-day bile duct injury.  Major complications were defined as one of the following: bleeding requiring an intervention, abscess, pancreatitis, bowel injury, or bile duct injury.  Minor complications were defined as any post-operative problem requiring re-evaluation or a change in management. 

Results: The 30-day readmission rate was 4.2% (n=18) for LC+IOC compared to 7.8% (n=27) for LC alone.  The LC alone group was 50% more likely to be readmitted with an OR 0.50 [95%CI 0.26-0.94], p=0.032.  Similarly, readmissions related to surgery were higher in the LC alone group (14 vs. 22, 0.47 [0.23-0.96], p=0.041).  Of these 36 patients, 24 were readmitted with a diagnosis of abdominal pain and to rule out or manage a bile leak or retained stone, 5 for infectious causes, 3 for respiratory issues, 1 for an NSTEMI, 1 for an incarcerated hernia, and 1 for management of a carcinoma.  The median LOS from readmissions related to surgery was 4 (IQR 7) for LC+IOC and 5 (IQR 3) for LC alone.  

Both groups were evenly matched with regards to patient characteristics.  There was a significantly increased risk of 90-day minor complications in the LC alone group (27 vs. 40, 0.55 [0.32-0.95], p=0.009).  There were no statistically significant differences in any of the other secondary outcomes, however, these events occurred more frequently in the LC alone group.

Conclusions: We found that 30-day readmissions were significantly increased in the LC alone group.  Furthermore, the majority of these readmissions were primarily for abdominal pain and to rule out or manage a bile leak or retained stone.  An added benefit of routine IOC may be a reduction in readmission rates. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87322

Program Number: S118

Presentation Session: Residents/Fellows Session

Presentation Type: ResFel

48

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals