• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • MIS Fellows Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Teaching Cues for Automated Virtual Coaching

Teaching Cues for Automated Virtual Coaching

Anand Malpani1, S. Swaroop Vedula1, Henry C Lin, PhD2, Gregory D Hager, PhD1. 1Johns Hopkins University, 2Intuitive Surgical Inc.

Objectives:

We developed the concept of teaching cues to demonstrate errors and expert behavior, and deficit metrics to measure performance deviations from such ideal behavior with the goal of delivering automated virtual coaching for enhanced learning and skill acquisition.

Methods:

We used the da Vinci® Skills Simulator, a virtual reality (VR) trainer for robot-assisted surgery. We chose the needle passing (NP) task that involved eight NPs around a circle from inside to outside. We used visual feedback in the form of 3D graphics that overlay onto the console viewer of the system. Based on the ACS Surgery Residents Skills Curriculum Phase 1 modules, we targeted the learning elements of needle grasping, positioning and driving, and presented cues on:

  • which instrument (left/right) to use for the current NP,
  • where and at what angle should the needle be grasped, and
  • how the needle should be driven through the tissue.

We measured deficit metrics associated to teaching cues (lower values indicate better performance).

  • Grasp Position Deviation (GP) is absolute difference between participant’s grasp position along the needle curvature compared to the ideal position.
  • Grasp Orientation Deviation (GO) is absolute difference between participant’s grasp angle and perpendicular direction of the needle’s plane.
  • Ideal Path Deviation (in-plane (IPI) and out-of-plane (IPO)) is absolute difference between needle tip trajectory and the ideal needle curvature that should be followed through the tissue.

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial at Intuitive Surgical Inc. (Sunnyvale, California), to test the effect of our coaching framework versus independent learning on technical skill. We recruited clinical trainers who oversee the robotic training center and engineers. The experimental group performed three task repetitions along with our teaching cues and control group did so without any teaching cues, in addition to a baseline and final performance. We compared change from baseline for the deficit metrics between groups using a Mann-Whitney U test.

Results:

Of the 32 participants recruited, we excluded data from 2 participants due to technical glitches resulting in 14 (experimental) and 16 (control) subjects. We saw statistically significant difference between the groups in the GO metric (p-value = 0.04; experimental: -14.53; control: -4.22). We did not observe significant differences in other metrics (GP: experimental = -3.73 and control = 4.19; IPI: experimental = 0.00 and control = -0.01; IPO: experimental = -0.01 and control = -0.02).

Conclusions:

Coaching is critical for skill development and facilitates lifelong learning in surgery. Teaching errors and deficits (critique) and showing correct and expert behavior (demonstrate) are core coaching activities. Our study provides proof-of-concept that automated virtual coaching based on targeted teaching cues and objective assessment using deficit metrics is feasible in VR and may be effective in skill acquisition. A larger controlled study in a representative population of surgeons is required to validate our coaching framework.

Acknowledgments:

We are thankful to SenseGraphics AB (Sweden) and Link Foundation Fellowship for Advanced Training and Simulation.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 84306

Program Number: ETP720

Presentation Session: Emerging Technology Poster

Presentation Type: Poster

77

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related



Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals