• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Taking the Training Wheels Off: Transitioning from Robotic Assisted to Total Laparoscopic Whipple

Taking the Training Wheels Off: Transitioning from Robotic Assisted to Total Laparoscopic Whipple

June S Peng, MD, Trang K Nguyen, Hari B Keshava, Toms Augustin, Nelson A Royall, Sricharan Chalikonda. Cleveland Clinic

Introduction: There is a substantial learning curve to performing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIS-PD) for surgeons who are trained in open PD. The learning curve to transition from robotic assisted PD (RAPD) to total laparoscopic PD (TLPD) is not well established.

Methods: MIS-PDs performed between January 2014 and June 2017 performed by SC as a surgeon or co-surgeon were included for analysis. MIS-PDs were performed using a robotic assisted technique prior to August 2016, and TLPDs were performed subsequently. RAPDs performed prior to 2014 were excluded to limit the comparison to RAPDs after the initial learning curve. Demographics, clinical and pathologic outcomes, operative and post-operative outcomes were compared.

Results: A total of 28 RAPDs and 12 TLPDs were scheduled during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in age, body mass index, or prior abdominal surgery. Median time from initial clinic consultation to surgery was 35 days for the RAPD group versus 15 days in the TLPD group (p = 0.005). Conversion to laparotomy was required in 4 of 28 patients (14.3%) in the RAPD group versus 2 of 12 patients (16.7%) in the TLPD group (p > 0.99).

For completed MIS-PDs, there were no statistically significant differences in the operative time (449 minutes for RAPD versus 416 minutes for TLPD, p = 0.22), adenocarcinoma on pathology (58.3% versus 60.0%, p > 0.99), tumor size (2.5 cm for both groups), or R0 margin (83.3% vs 100%, p = 0.30). There were small differences favoring TLPD for estimated blood loss (150 mL for RAPD versus 75 mL for TLPD, p < 0.001) and nodal harvest (15 versus 20 lymph nodes, p = 0.045). There was no difference in development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (20.8% versus 20.0%, p > 0.99), Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV complications (37.5% versus 30.0%, p > 0 .99), length of stay (6.0 versus 5.5 days, p = 0.67), or 90-day readmission (20.8% versus 50.0%, p = 0.09). The ratio of the mean cost of RAPD to TLPD was 0.95 for disposable items (95% CI 0.60-2.16) and 1.04 for total operative costs (95% CI 0.81-1.41). There was no 90-day mortality in either group.

Discussion: In this single surgeon experience, transitioning from RAPD to TLPD was not associated with an additional learning curve. TLPD in this setting is associated with improved time to resection, and equivalent technical, pathologic, and clinical outcomes. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 84910

Program Number: P540

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

54

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals