• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Surgical Outcomes and Operative Risk of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Results From a Large Single Center Cohort

Surgical Outcomes and Operative Risk of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Results From a Large Single Center Cohort

Oh Jeong, MD, Young Kyu Park, MD PhD, Mi Ran Jeong, MD, Kwang Yong Kim, MD. Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, South Korea

 

Background: Compared to the widespread use of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for early gastric cancer, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) still remains as a challenging procedure, because of its technical difficulties and concerns about subsequent complications. In this study, we evaluated surgical outcomes and operation risk of LTG in comparison with those of LDG, and sought to analyze risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality of LTG for gastric carcinoma.
Methods: Among prospectively constructed data of 1064 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy between April 2007 and May 2011, there were 118 patients who underwent LTG for middle and upper gastric cancer. Surgical outcomes, such as operative results, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality, were investigated, and were compared with those of LDG.
Results: There were 77 males and 41 females with a mean age of 63.7 years. When compared with LDG, patients with LTG showed older age, lower BMI, larger tumor size, and more advanced tumor depth with regard to the clinicopathological features. Of 118 patients, there was one case of open conversion and three cases of intraoperative complication. Nineteen (16.1%) patients underwent D2 lymphadenectomy, and 73 (61.9%) underwent complete omentectomy. Mean operating time was 292 ± 88 min and total harvested lymph nodes were 41 ± 16. Patients with LTG experienced significantly longer operation time (292 vs. 220 min, p < 0.001) and more intraoperative blood loss (256 vs. 191 ml, p = 0.002) than those with LDG. Overall morbidity rate was 22.9% (27 of 118 patients), which was significantly higher than those with LDG (22.9% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.002). There were 2 (1.7%) cases of postoperative mortality. The most common complication was anastomosis leakage (n=9) and luminal bleeding (n=9), followed by abdominal infection (n=3) and abdominal bleeding (n=2). Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factor of postoperative morbidity revealed that old age (≥ 60yrs, OR=2.55, 95% CI=0.95-6.84) and D2 lymphadenectomy (OR=3.87, 95% CI=1.30-11.55) were independent risk factor for postoperative complications.
Conclusions: LTG is feasible technique for the treatment of upper and middle gastric cancer. However, it carries greater operative risk than those of LDG. Further improvement of anastomosis technique and much experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy are warranted for the proper application of LTG for gastric carcinoma.
 


Session Number: SS18 – Foregut
Program Number: S097

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search