• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Surgeons, ERCP, and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: Do We Need a Standard Approach for Common Bile Duct Stones?

Rebeccah B Baucom, MD1, Irene D Feurer, PhD1, Julia S Shelton, MD, MPH2, Kristy L Kummerow, MD1, Michael D Holzman, MD, MPH1, Benjamin K Poulose, MD, MPH1. 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2University of Louisville

Background Management of choledocholithiasis (CDL) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate associations between demographic and practice-related characteristics and CDL management.

Methods A 22 item, web-based survey was administered to U.S. general surgeons. Respondents were classified into metropolitan or non-metropolitan groups by zip code. Univariate tests and multivariable regression were used to determine factors associated with CDL management preferences.

Results The survey was sent to 33,331 surgeons; 9,902 performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in last year; 750 of 771 respondents had a valid U.S. zip code and were included in the analysis. Mean practice time was 18±10 years, 87% were male, and 83% practiced in a metropolitan area. For CDL discovered preoperatively, 86% chose preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and 7% laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Those in metropolitan areas were more likely to select preoperative ERCP than those in non-metropolitan areas (88% vs. 79%, p<0.001). The top reasons for not performing LCBDE were: having a reliable ERCP proceduralist available, lack of equipment, and lack of comfort performing LCBDE (Figure). Factors associated with preoperative ERCP were: metropolitan status, selective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), and availability of a reliable ERCP proceduralist (Table). Those who perform selective IOC were 70% less likely to prefer LCBDE (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.57, p<0.001). Those with a reliable ERCP proceduralist available were 90% less likely to prefer LCBDE (0R 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.26, p<0.001).

image

Multivariable Model Predicting Preference for Preoperative ERCP
Variable Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p-value
Metropolitan (ref: non-metropolitan) 2.50 1.30-4.82 0.006
Years in practice (ref: >30)
≤5 1.06 0.40-2.86 0.905
6-10 0.76 0.31-1.86 0.549
11-20 0.87 0.42-1.77 0.691
21-30 0.87 0.43-1.75 0.687
Male 1.12 0.58-2.16 0.747
ERCP at primary institution (ref: requires referral) 0.50 0.23-1.06 0.068
Selective IOC (ref: routine) 2.73 1.75-4.27 <0.001
Residency type (ref: community)
Community hospital, university affiliated 1.40 0.65-3.03 0.395
University hospital/VA 0.89 0.45-1.77 0.734
Practice type (ref: community)
Community hospital, university affiliated 1.75 0.90-3.39 0.098
University hospital/VA 0.91 0.49-1.69 0.764
Reliable ERCP proceduralist available (ref: none available) 2.25 1.41-3.59 0.001
Time constraints limit LCBDE (ref: not a limitation) 0.76 0.47-1.24 0.275

Conclusions The majority of respondents preferred pre-operative ERCP for CDL management. Having a reliable ERCP proceduralist available and selective IOC were independently associated with ERCP, regardless of metropolitan status. Many surgeons are uncomfortable performing LCBDE, and increased training is needed.

159

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2015 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons