• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Short-term Morbidity of 1,597 Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypasses: A Single Institution Experience

Short-term Morbidity of 1,597 Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypasses: A Single Institution Experience

James G Bittner IV, MD, Gretchen Aquilina, DO, Luke Wolfe, MS, Jill Meador, RN, James W Maher, MD, John M Kellum, MD. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to ascertain the 30 and 90-day procedure-related morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) at a single university hospital to facilitate consistent patient counseling and informed consent.

METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted on all patients who underwent primary LRYGB at an American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence from 1998-2012. LRYGB technique and postoperative management algorithms were standardized and consistent throughout the study period. LRYGB was performed in a retrocolic, retrogastric fashion with linear stapled anastomoses. Data assessed were patient demographics and postoperative outcomes at 30 and 90 days including rates and severity of wound infection, leak, marginal ulcer, stomal stenosis, bowel obstruction, internal hernia, incisional hernia, venous thromboembolism, readmission, and overall morbidity and mortality. Additional outcomes included primary procedure-related reoperation rate and the type of intervention required.

RESULTS: In total, 1,597 patients underwent LRYGB. Most were available for follow-up at 30 (96.7%) and 90 days (98.7%). Mean patient age and body mass index (BMI) were 42.1 ± 11 years and 48.9 ± 7.8 kg/m2, respectively. Most patients were female (84.6%) and Caucasian (76.6%). Overall 30 and 90-day morbidity were low (10% and 15%). The higher 90-day morbidity was due, in large part, to the increased incidence of marginal ulcer and stomal stenosis diagnosed between 31 and 90 days (Table 1). In all, 70 patients (4.4%) required reoperation for gastrointestinal leak (n=48) and small bowel obstruction (n=22). The majority of reoperations were required within the first 30 days postoperatively. No invasive treatments were required for other assessed complications. Of 91 patients readmitted within 90 days, principal admission diagnoses were abdominal pain (38%), nausea/vomiting (35%), bowel obstruction (3%), infection (8%), venous thromboembolism (6%), gastrointestinal bleeding (4%), and other (4%). The 30-day mortality rate was low (0.6%) with no death occurring between 31 and 90 days.

Table 1. Short-term morbidity of 1,597 primary gastric bypasses

Complication (%)

30 days (n=1,545)

90 days  (n=1,576)

Minor infection

8 (0.5)

9 (0.6)

Major infection

7 (0.5)

7 (0.4)

Gastrointestinal leak

68 (4.4)

68 (4.3)

Marginal ulcer

15 (1)

53 (3.4)

Stomal stenosis

13 (0.8)

42 (2.7)

Bowel obstruction

23 (1.5)

30 (1.9)

Internal hernia

1 (0.1)

4 (0.3)

Incisional hernia

11 (0.7)

15 (1)

Venous thromboembolism

13 (0.8)

14 (0.9)

Readmission

62 (4)

91 (5.8)

Reoperation

62 (4)

70 (4.4)

Complication rates reported at 90 days are cumulative.

CONCLUSIONS: In a large single-institution series of LRYGB, short-term outcomes demonstrated low rates of overall morbidity and mortality. The most common complication and indication for reoperation was gastrointestinal leak. The increased incidence of marginal ulcer and stomal stenosis from 30 to 90 days contributed to higher rates of readmission and overall morbidity. Patient counseling about the potential complications of LRYGB should include a risk frequency profile compiled from local outcomes data whenever possible.

View Poster

46

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals