• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Robotic Foregut Surgery: One Surgeon\’s Experience with Nissen Fundopliction, Esophagomyotomy, and Hiatal Hernia Repair

Robotic Foregut Surgery: One Surgeon\’s Experience with Nissen Fundopliction, Esophagomyotomy, and Hiatal Hernia Repair

Objective: To review the use of robotic assistance during foregut surgery including Nissen fundoplication, esophagomyotomy, and hiatal hernia repair. We evaluated a seven-year experience of one minimally invasive surgery fellowship-trained surgeon performing 124 foregut operations using the Da Vinci Telerobotic system. Surgical resident participation was tracked over this same period.

Methods: An IRB approved retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 2002 – 2009 of 71 Nissen fundoplications, 26 esophagomyotomies, and 27 hiatal hernia repairs was performed. Data collected for all three groups included gender, age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), port set up time (PST), robot operating time (ROT), total case time (TCT), length of stay (LOS), complications, conversions, and resident involvement. Statistical analysis using the Anova test was conducted.

Results: One-hundred and twenty-four robotic assisted foregut operations were performed on 45 males and 79 females with a mean age of 54.8 ± 16.7 (18-85) years. The mean TCT was 174.4 ± 45.0 (102-321) min.

Nissen fundoplication results included: mean BMI of 30.8 ± 3.9 (22.4-46.8) kg/m², EBL 30.2 ± 21.8 (5-100) ml, PST 32.3 ± 9 (14-63) min, ROT 111.4 ± 37.3 (51-229) min, and TCT 175 ± 46.4 (102-321) min. The median LOS was 1 (0-9) day. The complication rate was 7.0% (5/71). Four cases were converted to laparoscopy, none to open, with a conversion rate of 5.6 %. Residents were involved in the Nissen fundoplication cases 69.0% (49/71) of the time.

Esophagomyotomy results included: mean BMI of 26.5 ± 6.1 (15.4-36.6) kg/m², EBL 39.1 ± 41.7 (10-200) ml, PST 28 ± 8.6 (16-47) min, ROT 122.9 ± 45 (31-217) min, and TCT 178 ± 40.5 (105-262) min. The median LOS was 1 (0-6) day. The complication rate was 15.4% (4/26) including 1 case of iatrogenic gastric perforation. No conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy was needed. Residents were involved in the esophagomyotomies 69.2% (18/26) of the time.

Hiatal hernia repair results included: mean BMI of 28.4 ± 4.2 (21.9-36.8) kg/m², EBL 38.4 ± 32.7 (10-150) ml, PST 28.8 ± 8.0 (17-52) min, ROT 109.0 ± 44.5 (49-250) min, and TCT 169.2 ± 46.5 (102-299) min. The median LOS was 1 (1-14) day. The complication rate was 11.1% (3/27). One case was converted to laparoscopy, none to open, with a conversion rate of 3.7%. Residents were involved in the hiatal hernia repairs 66.7% (18/27) of the time.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted foregut surgery is safe and effective. This series compares favorably with other robotic studies in length of hospital stay, total case time, and rates of complication and conversion. Resident participation was significant and increased over the training period. Foregut surgery is an excellent robotic training ground for residents with its narrow operative field and diversity of skills required.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P557

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search