• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Remote FLS Testing: Ready for Prime Time

Allan Okrainec, MD2, Melina Vassiliou, MD1, M. Carolina Jimenez, MD2, Oscar Henao, MD2, Pepa Kaneva, MSc1, Matthew Ritter, MD3. 2Toronto Western Hospital – University Health Network, Temerty/Chang Telesimulation Centre, Toronto, 1Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 3Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland

Introduction: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program has gained widespread acceptance throughout the world and is considered by many to be the gold standard for teaching and assessing laparoscopic skills. In order to become FLS certified, candidates must take the FLS exam at one of the 73 approved FLS regional testing centres across the United States and Canada, or at an FLS course offered at certain surgical conferences. Maintaining these test centres requires considerable investment in human and financial resources by SAGES. Additionally, it can be challenging for individuals outside North America to become FLS certified, with significant time and travel required. Preliminary work suggests that it may be possible to reliably score the FLS manual skills component remotely using videoconferencing software and equipment. Further work is needed, however, to ensure that testing protocols and procedures can be maintained according to defined testing standards established by SAGES, emphasizing the importance of test integrity and security.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate the integrity and validity of the FLS manual skills exam administered remotely in a real-world environment according to standard FLS testing protocols.

Methods: Two rooms were set up and connected via Skype using a previously described telesimulation configuration (Image 1). The test taker presented to the FLS testing room and was greeted by an invigilator who established the Skype connection. The remote proctor (RP) registered the test taker, directed the entire exam and scored the test. An onsite proctor (OP) was present as a control to silently score the exam and identify any critical errors. Testing materials were always kept within the field of view of the remote proctor. Each participant completed a pre- and a post-test questionnaire. Interrater reliabilities of onsite and remote FLS scoring data were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: Twenty participants took the FLS manual skills exam including 10 residents, 5 medical students, 3 fellows, and 2 attending surgeons. There was excellent interrater reliability between total FLS scores of the remote and onsite proctors (ICC 1.00, CI [1.00 – 1.00]). No critical errors were identified by the onsite proctor which would have affected the FLS score. Four testing sessions experienced a dropped Skype connection that needed to be restarted. In the post-test questionnaire, 80% of participants indicated an excellent or good experience with the remote testing experience. 90% thought that the results reported by the remote proctor would be accurate. All participants who had previous experience with the FLS test considered that standard in person and remote testing were comparable.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a remote proctor is able to administer the FLS manual skills exam reliably, securely, and according to FLS standards. With a consistent increase in the number of individuals around the world seeking FLS certification, remote proctoring could become a strategy to increase access to FLS certification while containing costs. Remote proctoring could also be considered as a way of maintaining quality standards at current FLS test centers.

Image 1 - Study setup

233

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2015 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons