• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Prospective Comparison of Short-term Outcomes Between Hybrid Notes Transvaginal Cholecystectomy and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Prospective Comparison of Short-term Outcomes Between Hybrid Notes Transvaginal Cholecystectomy and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Byron F Santos, MD, Eric S Hungness, MD, Ezra Teitelbaum, MD, Fahd O Arafat, MD, Magdy P Milad, MD, Nathaniel J Soper. Northwestern University

 

Introduction: A natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach has been recently applied to a number of intra-abdominal operations and offers the potential of reducing post-operative pain and convalescence. Here we present a single-institution series of hybrid NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomies (TVC) and compare short-term outcomes with patients undergoing traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods: All patients had an indication for elective cholecystectomy and met the following IRB approved inclusion criteria: female gender, age > 18 years, BMI < 35, ASA classification I or II, and absence of acute cholecystitis. TVC was performed using one or two transabdominal ports to enable gallbladder retraction and clip application. Dissection was performed with a flexible endoscope through a posterior colpotomy using instrumentation from the Advanced Toolbox for Minimally Invasive Surgery from Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Cincinnati, OH). LC was performed using four trocars and standard instrumentation. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare results.

Results: 7 patients underwent TVC and 7 patients underwent LC. Pre-operative demographics were similar between the two groups, including mean age (38 vs. 34; p = n.s.) and BMI (29 vs. 27; p = n.s.). Operative times were significantly longer for the TVC group (162 ±29 vs. 68 ±21 minutes; p < 0.001), whereas EBL was similar (39 vs. 8 ml; p = n.s.). All procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, except for one patient in each group who were discharged on POD #1. Three minor (Grade 1) complications occurred, two in the LC group and one in the TVC group. TVC patients required significantly less narcotics in the PACU (mean 1.3 ±1.7 vs. 8.2 ±5.9 mg IV morphine equivalents; p = .02). Mean VAS pain scores (scale 0-10) in the PACU were less in the TVC group at 30 minutes (1.1 ±1.3 vs. 5.1 ±3.1; p = .02) and 60 minutes (1.7 ±1.6 vs. 4.7 ±2.5; p = .02). Pain scores were also lower in the TVC group on post-operative days 1, 4 and 7 (2.4, 1, 0.1 vs. 5.9, 2.5, 2), although only significantly on POD #1 (p = .01). SF-36 Health Survey and McGill Pain Questionnaire scores were similar between groups at one month post-operatively. There was no difference between Sexual Function Questionnaire scores before and three months after TVC.

Conclusions: This series adds to the existing evidence that hybrid NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope for dissection is technically feasible and a safe procedure in women requiring elective surgery. TVC requires a longer operative time than LC but may result in less pain with patients subsequently requiring fewer narcotics. Further evidence is needed to validate these findings and a multi-center randomized controlled trial is currently in progress. 
 


Session Number: SS06 – NOTES
Program Number: S036

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search