• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters in High-risk Bariatric Surgery

Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters in High-risk Bariatric Surgery

Objective: High-risk patients are at significant risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and may benefit from the addition of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (rIVCF) to chemoprophylaxis. However, the optimal VTE prophylaxis has not been established in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. This observational study examines the use of rIVCFs in combination with chemoprophylaxis for high-risk bariatric surgery patients.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all high-risk morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery between February 2007 and July 2009. Patients were considered high-risk for the development of a peri-operative VTE if they had a prior history of VTE, a BMI≥ 55 kg/m2, were severely immobile, or had preexisting hypercoaguable condition. All patients underwent a preoperative venous duplex study. RIVCF placement was performed preoperatively on the day of the bariatric procedure. Standard chemoprophylaxis was initiated preoperatively and continued throughout the hospital stay. Clinical, demographic, operative and postoperative data were recorded. A venogram was performed prior to removal of the rIVCFs.

Results: Forty-four patients (12 men and 32 women) with a mean age of 47.9 ± 12.1 years and a mean BMI of 58 ± 9.5 kg/m2 underwent roux-en-y gastric bypass with concomitant rIVCF placement. Mean follow up was 184 days. One patient (2.3%) was found to have a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on preoperative venous duplex. All patients received VTE chemoprophylaxis preoperatively and successful rIVCF placement. Indications for rIVCF placement were BMI (68%), history of prior VTE (30%), and/or severe immobility (2%). The operation was performed laparoscopically in 41 patients (93%). Three patients (two revisional surgeries and one conversion secondary to intestinal adhesions) underwent open gastric bypass. The mean operative time was 111.1 ± 30.2 minutes and the mean length of stay was 3.2 ± 1.2 days. A postoperative venous duplex for the clinical suspicion of VTE was performed in four patients (9%), of which 2 were positive for the presence of a DVT. Retrieval was successful in 25 patients (57%). A venogram was performed prior to removal of each rIVCF. No significant thrombus was found, however, one filter had migrated to the right common iliac vein. Overall, there were two complications of rIVCF placement (4.5%), one during insertion and the other due to migration. One mortality (2%) occurred as the result of an arrhythmia; no pulmonary emboli were found.

Conclusions: This study documents that rIVCFs in high-risk bariatric surgery patients is associated with a low incidence of DVT (4.5%) and filter-related complications (4.5%) without pulmonary emboli. However, a significant portion of patients continue to have their filters in place. Long term effects of rIVCFs in patients who do not undergo retrieval are largely unknown. These long term effects need further investigation in order to appreciate the true benefit of rIVCFs in this patient population.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S055

56

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals