• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Prognostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in re-staging after neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer

Prognostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in re-staging after neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer

Introduction:
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with esophageal cancer is a useful diagnostic tool for locoregional tumor staging. Patients with advanced esophageal cancer receive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to downstage the tumor prior to surgery. The role and accuracy of EUS after neoadjuvant therapy is uncertain.
Methods:
Between 2002 and 2005 we prospectively enrolled 70 consecutive patients with localized esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy before esophagectomy and were evaluated prior and after neoadjuvant therapy. In 16 patients EUS staging was not performed due to esophageal stenosis. All patients underwent esophagectomy and specimens were reviewed for T and N category. EUS results were then compared to the pathologic findings.
Results
There were 44 male and 10 female with a mean age of 56 years (SD±5.6). 28 patients had squamous cell cancer and 26 patients had adenocarcinoma. The pathologic tumor stage was as followed: ypT0 n=10, ypT1 n=5, ypT2 n=11, ypT3 n=27, and ypT4 n=1. The overall accuracy for EUS after neoadjuvant therapy was determined as 39.6% for T status and 61.7% for N status. The sensitivity in EUS for T category was 40% for uT0, 0% for uT1, 18% for uT2, 55.6% for uT3, and 0% for uT4. The T category was overestimated in 36.2% and underestimated in 23.4%. The sensitivity and specificity for positive lymph node status was 64% and 58.6%, respectively. Tumor cell type and tumor location did not influence the EUS staging.
Conclusions:
Endosonographic staging after neoadjuvant therapy is not as accurate as it is reported for the initial staging. The prognostic value to predict downstaging is low, especially in tumors with good response and low T category.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P279

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search