• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) Vs. Laparoscopic HellerMyotomy (LHM), does gastric extension length matter?

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) Vs. Laparoscopic HellerMyotomy (LHM), does gastric extension length matter?

Mauricio Ramirez, MD, Cecilia Zubieta, MD, Franco Ciotola, MD, Adolfo Badaloni, MD, Fabio Nachman, MD, Alejandro Nieponice, MD. Hospítal Universitario Fundación Favaloro

Objective: to report our experience in POEM vs. LHM, with particular focus on myotomy extension.

Background: POEM has been adopted worldwide as a treatment for achalasia. While resolution of dysphagia is above 90%, postoperative reflux ranges from 10-57%. Myotomy length during LHM has always been a controversial topic. With POEM a shorter myotomy on the gastric side may provide equal relief of dysphagia with less postoperative reflux.

Methods: Thirty-five cases of POEM were prospectively analyzed and compared retrospectively to the last 35 patients that underwent LHM, from December 2010 to August 2016. Mean follow-up was 10months (6/32) for POEM and 20months (6/68) for LHM. All patients with LHM had a myotomy extension >=3cm on the gastric side. In POEM cases, extension was defined by direct vision (Hill type II) and never exceeded 2cm. Endpoints included Eckardt score (ES), presence of symptomatic reflux by GERD-HRQL, need for PPI, and esophagitis ruled out by endoscopy.

Results: LHM and POEM were completed and followed-up in 100% of patients. Efficacy (ES<=3) was 33/35 (94.2%) for POEM and 32/35 (91.4%) for LHM in a short term follow up. And 31/35 (88.6%), 27/35 (77.1%) respectably, in a long term follow up, with average ES drop from 9 to 1.2 (p=0.0001) in POEM vs. 9.2 to 1.3 (p=0.0001) in LHM. Post operative complications occurred in 1 patient (leak) for LHM requiring reoperation and 1 patient (massive capnothorax) in POEM. Hospital stay was shorter for POEM than for LHM (1.3 vs. 2.1 respectively) (p=0.0001). Symptomatic reflux cases included 7/35 POEM (20 %) vs. 6/35 LHM (17.1%) (p=0.4620). Esophagitis signs in endoscopy appeared in 1/21 POEM (4.7%) vs. 1/22 LHM (%4.5) (p=1.000). Patients requiring PPI included 8/35 POEM (22.8%) vs.7/35 LHM (20%) (p=0.6642). Further treatment (endoscopic dilation) was performed in 10/35 POEM (28.5%) vs.8/35 LHM (22.8%).

Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy of POEM with similar perioperative outcomes than LHM. The shorter myotomy on the gastric side in POEM may contribute to an acceptable reflux rate with comparable relief of dysphagia. Although our follow up for POEM is shorter than for LHM, the trends are promising and warrant future prospective studies to address this topic.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 78646

Program Number: S074

Presentation Session: Flexible / Therapeutic Endoscopy and NOTES

Presentation Type: Podium

81

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals