• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Perioperative Outcomes and Fellow Experience During Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery Training

Rouzbeh Mostaedi, MD, Mohamed R Ali, MD. University of California, Davis

Introduction

Reports have identified the learning curve for minimally invasive bariatric surgery (MIBS) and compared the outcomes from “fellow cases” to outcomes from “attending cases.” While such comparisons have generally been favorable, we have observed that the operative performance of MIBS fellows often improves dramatically over the course of training. Thus, we sought to determine whether patient outcomes would be affected by the level of experience of the fellow during training.

Methods and Procedures

Clinical, operative, and outcome data were reviewed for 984 consecutive primary MIBS cases [Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB)] performed at a single academic institution over 6 years. These cases were performed by the fellow with attending assistance. Clinical (demographic, anthropomorphic, comorbidity), operative, and outcomes data were compared between cases performed during the first half of the fellowship year and cases performed during the second half.

Results

Procedures were categorized by case type and time of year: 479 MIBS cases performed during the first six months (RYGB-A=365, VSG-A=69, AGB-A=45) and 505 MIBS cases performed during the second six months (RYGB-B=338, VSG-B=108, AGB-B=59) of training. RYGB-A and RYGB-B were comparable in age (44.8±11.6 years vs 44.9±8.1 years, p=0.91), gender distribution (80.0% women vs 79.3% women, p=0.89), body mass index (BMI) (47.3±8.1 kg/m2 vs 46.9±8.1 kg/m2, p=0.54), estimated blood loss (EBL) (72.2±70.4 ml vs 74.5±107.7 ml, p=0.74), and hospital length of stay (LOS) (48.5±48.8 hours vs 44.3±28.8 hours, p=0.11). Patients in VSG-B group were older (47.4±9.6 years vs 44.4±10.0 years, p<0.05) than VSG-A group, but there were no differences in gender distribution (79.7% women vs 80.6% women, p=0.99), BMI (44.7±7.9 kg/m2 vs 43.2±6.5 kg/m2, p=0.32), EBL (42.7±53.0 ml vs 47.7±86.7 ml, p=0.63), or LOS (52.2±31.9 hours vs 50.7±31.0 hours, p=0.76). No statistical differences were identified between AGB-A and AGB-B in age, gender, EBL, or LOS. However, BMI was higher in the second half of the year (AGB-B) (47.1±8.9 kg/m2 vs 43.9±6.3 kg/m2, p<0.05). For all comparisons, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification, history of prior abdominopelvic surgery, and severity of obesity-related comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and obstructive sleep apnea) were not significantly different between the respective groups.

Operative time did not change significantly for VSG (116.7±39.4 minutes vs 110.9±41.3 minutes, p=0.35) or AGB (113.2±44.1 minutes vs 98.2±39.7 minutes, p=0.07) but was significantly improved for RYGB (184.2±45.5 minutes vs 159.3±52.4 minutes, p<0.0001). Overall, major morbidity and mortality (M&M) were low (venous thromboembolism=0.51%, splenic injury=0.30%, transfusion=2.13%, gastrointestinal hemorrhage=0.10%, wound infection=0.30%, marginal ulcer=1.34%, internal hernia=0.16%, reoperation=0.51%, mortality=0.10%). M&M rates did not significantly differ from the first to second half of the year (4.13% vs 4.12%, p=0.996).

Conclusions

VSG and AGB can be performed with technical adeptness early in fellowship. RYGB is technically more complex, and fellows will improve operative efficiency during the latter part of training. Regardless, surgical outcomes are not adversely affected by relative inexperience of MIBS fellows early in the fellowship year in patients of similar surgical complexity, acuity, and disease severity.

44

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2015 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons