• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Peg Placement Outcomes in the Obese Patient Population

Peg Placement Outcomes in the Obese Patient Population

Onur C Kutlu, MD, Diana Vega-burgueno, MD, Ari Halldorsson, MD, Sharmila Dissanaike, MD. Texas Tech University, Department of General Surgery

 

Obesity has reached a state of a global epidemic. No society therefore no health system is spared from the effects of the disease. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube is frequently used in patients with swallowing dysfunction. Each year more than one hundred thousand PEG placement procedures are performed in the United States. Despite the frequent use of the technique and the ever increasing prevalence of obesity we could only find four papers in the medical literature on PEG placement and obesity. Our search of National Library of Medicine revealed only one article published on outcomes of obese patients undergone PEG placement.

In this study we would like to present our experience on PEG placement on the obese patient at an Academic Medical Center.

Patients and Methods:
All patients undergone PEG placement between 2006-2010 were retrospectively analyzed based on gender, body mass index, type of pathology, indication for PEG placement outcome, type of complication encountered and hospital stay. Patients who had a BMI over 30 kg/m2 were compared to normal BMI group in terms of complications. We later further analyzed the type and frequency of the complications encountered.
 

Results:
341 patient underwent PEG placement at our institution between 2006-2010. 76 were obese (BMI>30kg/m2).
 

Indications were dysphagia 50%, intracranial tumor 13.9%, gastrointestinal tumors 1.4%, head and neck cancer %5.6, cerebrovascular accident 18.1%, anoxic brain injury in 5.6%, dementia 1.4%. 25.8% of the patients were admitted due to trauma and 13.9% suffered burns.

The complication rate was 28% in the obese patient group vs. 27% in the normal BMI group. Overall complication rate was 27.6%.Chi square statistical analyses showed no significant difference between two groups. Types of complications encountered in the obese group were ileus 4.1% , Peristomal infection in 6.8%, buried bumper in 2.7%, gastric ulcer in 1.6%, inadvertent removal in 14%, aspiration in 6.8%, hemorrhage in 1.4%, 11% of patients died within 30 days.
 

Conclusion:
The reported complication rate for PEG placement in literature varies between 10% in selected patients up to 42% in the terminally ill oncological patient. The reported 30 day mortality rate after PEG placement varies between 2% to 12%. The mortality and complication rates in our series falls within the reported ranges of different authors.

Analyzing indications, co-morbidies and outcomes, we have observed that PEG placement has a similar safety profile in the obese patient group compared to the normal BMI patients. Despite the procedural challenges due to body habitus, we believe that PEG placement can be utilized as a safe tecnique to be used in the obese population requiring long term nutritional support.
 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P259
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search