• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Online versus In-Person Education Classes: Effect on Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery

Online versus In-Person Education Classes: Effect on Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery

Emily C Benham, MD, Anahita Jalilvand, MD, Kelsey Russell, RDN, LD, Adam Freter, RDN, LD, Bradley Needleman, MD, Sabrena Noria, MD, PhD. The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center

Objectives: Successful outcomes after bariatric surgery (BS) require a comprehensive educational program (CEP) focused on post-surgical dietary and lifestyle changes.  At our institution, patients must comply with a 4-week Life-After-Surgery program prior to surgery. Since many patients are not able to participate in-person, an online CEP was created to improve accessibility. To evaluate comprehension, a 16-question test is administered at the last preoperative visit to participants of both classes. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of online versus in-person CEP in terms of comprehension and post-operative weight loss.

Methods: Patients who underwent BS from August 2016-May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. All patients who underwent the in-person or online CEP, completed the 16-question test, and had post-operative follow-up for at least 6 months were included. Baseline demographic, operative, and weight data were obtained using the electronic medical record. Percent excess body weight-loss (EBWL) was determined for patients at 2, 8 and 24 weeks after surgery. Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Chi squared, and Fisher’s Exact tests were utilized to calculate significance. Independent predictors of EBWL were determined using multiple linear regression. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 95 patients participated in the online (51.58%) or in-person (48.42%) CEP, of which 81% were female, the mean age was 45.2 ± 11.4 years, and the mean pre-operative BMI was 49.8 ± 8.2 kg/m2. Most had private insurance (77%), while the remainder had Medicaid/Medicare (23%). Although test scores did not differ between the online and in-person courses (78.3% vs 78.6%, p=0.9041), scores were higher for patients who took the test < 2 months after course completion (81% vs 75%, P=0.019) and had private insurance (81% vs 75%, P=0.0128). While test scores did not correlate with EBWL at any post-operative time point, significant independent predictors of EBWL at 2-weeks included the in-person CEP (p=0.035) and male gender (p=0.036).

Conclusion: The results demonstrate that test scores did not differ by course type and did not correlate to post-operative EBWL. However, in-person CEP was an independent predictor of improved EBWL at 2 weeks, suggesting an advantage over online courses not captured by the test scores. The difference in scores by insurance status further underscores the importance of optimizing the method of evaluating comprehension. Future studies are required to investigate the effectiveness of these different modalities.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86479

Program Number: P573

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

39

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals