• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • SAGES Store
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES Video Subscription
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
    • Fellows Career Development Course
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
    • SAGES Pearls
    • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • OWLS / FLS
  • Log In

Normal Johnson-DeMeester Scores should not preclude patients from Anti-Reflux Surgery

Alex Addo, MD, Zachary Sanford, MD, Adam S Weltz, MD, James Clemmens, Reza Zahiri, DO, Adrian Park, MD, FACS. Anne Arundel Medical Center

Introduction: The Johnson-DeMeester (JD) score is one of the main parameters derived from pH testing as a means to determine a patient’s acid exposure and is often used as an objective data point to determine potential need for anti-reflux surgery.  The purpose of this study was to determine if a normal JD score alone is sufficient to preclude patients from consideration for laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to review quality of life (QOL) outcomes after LARS in patients with a normal (<14.7) versus abnormal (≥14.7) JD score at a high volume foregut disorder center between October 2012 and April 2018.  [AW1] Patient QOL was assessed using four validated surveys: Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI), GERD Health Related Quality of Life Score (GERD-HRQL), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux-Health Related Quality of Life Instrument (LPR-HRQL), and Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL). Additional study outcomes included 30-day wound and non-wound related complications, readmission and reoperation rates.

Results: 144 patients with mean follow up of 1.8 years (1 month – 5 years) were selected for this study, 38 (26.4%) with normal and 100 (73.6%) with abnormal JD scores.  The two groups had significantly different mean JD scores (7.40 vs 57.64, p< 0.05). Among the normal and abnormal cohorts thirty day wound and non-wound related complications were 0%. All patients derived significant QOL benefits from operative intervention regardless of JD scores with improvements in mean RSI (65%), GERD-HRQL (79%), LPR-HRQOL (77%), and SWAL (19%) surveys through five years [AW2] in greatest follow up (p<0.01). A comparison between the groups did not show any differences in post-operative outcomes and [AW3] percent improvement in QOL outcomes. No patients required reoperation. Patient satisfaction was strong at long term follow up, with both groups reporting either “satisfied” or “neutral” in 94% of cases.

Conclusion: Our findings confirm that the JD score alone does not correlate with QOL outcomes after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.  Patients with objective diagnosis of GERD despite a normal JD score should not be precluded from consideration for anti-reflux surgery.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 95572

Program Number: P496

Presentation Session: Poster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

View this Poster

1,473

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related



  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons