• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Nationwide Outcomes and Costs of Laparoscopic and Robotic versus Open Hepatectomies

Chetan Patel, MD, Joshua Parreco, MD, Srinivas Kaza, MD, Alvaro Castillo, MD. University of Miami Palm Beach

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have demonstrated a wide range of readmission rates after hepatectomy and have been limited to readmissions at a single institution and an inability to distinguish elective from nonelective readmissions. The purpose of this study was to determine the nationwide readmission rate after hepatectomy and to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic versus an open approach.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The Nationwide Readmission Database for 2013 was queried for all patients undergoing a hepatectomy. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomies were compared to patients undergoing open hepatectomy. The mean and standard deviation (SD) was calculated for continuous variables and compared using t-test for equality of means. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios (OR) for the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS: There were 6,721 patients undergoing hepatectomies in 2013, and 402 (6.0%) were done with a laparoscopic or robotic approach. During the initial admission, 187 (2.8%) patients died. Of the survivors, 983 (15.0%) had nonelective readmissions within 45 days and 189 (19.2%) of these patients were readmitted to a different hospital. The laparoscopic and robotic patients had fewer comorbidities (2.2 +/1.6 versus 2.4 +/1.8, p<0.01, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4) and a shorter length of stay (7.0 +/6.8 versus 8.9 +/10.5 days, p<0.01, 95% CI 0.9 to 3.0). They also had a lower mean weighted cost of the initial admission ($255,993.61 +/ $246,188.97 versus $310,952.16 +/ $392,244.23, p<0.01, 95% CI 15,626.49 to 94,290.62). The strongest predictors of death during the mean follow up period (32.8 +/60.8 days) were anastomosis of hepatic duct to gastrointestinal tract (OR 3.38, p<0.01, 95% CI 2.26 to 5.05) and age >=65 years (OR 2.47, p<0.01, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.56). The strongest predictors of readmission within 45 days were 3 or more comorbidities (OR 2.48, p<0.01, 95% CI 1.88 to 3.27) and anastomosis of hepatic duct to gastrointestinal tract (OR 2.33, p<0.01, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.15). Open versus laparoscopic and robotic was not a significant risk factor for death (OR 1.48, p=0.20, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.69) or readmission within 45 days (OR 1.11, p=0.50, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.50).

CONCLUSION(S): Many patients are readmitted to different hospitals after hepatectomy and this could lead to an underestimation of readmission rates. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic versus open hepatectomy have similar rates of mortality and nonelective readmission.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 78802

Program Number: S081

Presentation Session: SAGES Got Talent : Resident & Fellow Scientific Session

Presentation Type: ResFel

40

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2017 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons