• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Motor Response to Multiple Rapid Swallows (mrs) Can Predict Dysphagia in Patients Scheduled for Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

Motor Response to Multiple Rapid Swallows (mrs) Can Predict Dysphagia in Patients Scheduled for Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

Nathaniel Stoikes, MD, Jesse Drapekin, RA, Anisa Shaker, MD, Vladimir Kushnir, MD, L. Michael Brunt, MD, C. Prakash Gyawali, MD. Division of Gastroenterology and Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis

INTRODUCTION:  When multiple swallows (MRS) are rapidly administered, esophageal peristalsis is inhibited, and pronounced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation ensues.  After the last swallow of the series, a robust contraction sequence results.  Abnormal responses include incomplete inhibition or suboptimal contraction after MRS.  We speculate that MRS has value in predicting esophageal transit symptoms in patients undergoing laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS).

METHODS AND PROCEDURES:  Records of patients undergoing esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM, Sierra Scientific/Given Imaging, Los Angeles, CA) before LARS were evaluated.  Inclusion criteria included symptom score sheets evaluating esophageal symptoms (dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain) before and after LARS, completion of MRS procedure (5 rapid swallows of 2 mL water 3-5 seconds apart) during HRM, and an adequate HRM study without artifacts.  MRS was evaluated for adequate inhibitory response during swallows, and contraction pattern following MRS. Contraction patterns were evaluated separately in proximal (S2) and distal (S3) smooth muscle contraction segments on HRM.  Abnormal MRS responses included the following: incomplete inhibition, abnormal contraction (S2, S3 or both) or presence of an intersegmental trough (IST) of >3 cm between skeletal and smooth muscle contraction segments when peristalsis was intact.

RESULTS:  Sixty-three patients (mean age 60.3±1.7 yrs, 48 F) undergoing HRM prior to LARS successfully performed MRS (median 5 swallows, longest interval 3.2 ±0.1s between swallows).  At presentation, all patients had heartburn or regurgitation; 28 subjects (44.4%) reported some degree of dysphagia to solids or liquids.  Mean LES end-expiratory pressure was low (11.2 ±1.3 mmHg); 16 patients had values <5 mmHg. On HRM wet swallows, patients had a mean of 84.5% transmitted sequences; 8 had at least moderate esophageal body hypomotility (of which 6 had ≥80% peristaltic failure).  After MRS, 14 patients (22.2%) had an intact peristaltic sequence. Of the remainder, 29 patients (46.0%) had segmental failure (complete failure=19; failure of S2=10); 18 (28.6%) had incomplete inhibition; and 14 (22.2%) had an IST; some had overlapping abnormalities.  When stratified by presence or absence of dysphagia, 46.2% of subjects without dysphagia had a normal MRS response; 76.9% had formation of peristaltic segments following MRS.  In contrast, only 16.0% of subjects with dysphagia (10.7% with preoperative dysphagia and 22.7% with postoperative dysphagia) had a normal MRS response (p≤0.03 compared to subjects with no dysphagia).  Of patients with pre-LARS dysphagia who had worsening dysphagia following LARS, 62.5% had an abnormal MRS response.  Incomplete inhibition during MRS (39.3%) was the predominant pattern with pre-LARS dysphagia, while absent peristalsis after MRS (36.4%) dominated in subjects with post-LARS dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS:  High resolution manometry with multiple rapid swallows helps predict dysphagia in subjects undergoing preoperative esophageal function testing prior to LARS.  Our results suggest differing pathophysiologic mechanisms for pre- and post-LARS dysphagia.

 


Session Number: SS18 – Foregut
Program Number: S103

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search