• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Measuring Transfer of Skill from the Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST) to EASIE-R Model

Measuring Transfer of Skill from the Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST) to EASIE-R Model

Nicole Santos1, Akole Lamien2, Austin Findley2, Michael Galloway2, Minia Hellan2, Mary McCarthy2, Thomas Simon2, Ali Linsk1, Alex Derevianko1, Jaisa Olasky3, Emilie Fitzpatrick4, Brian Nguyen4, Steven Schwaitzberg5, Daniel Jones4, Suvranu De6, Caroline G Cao2. 1Cambridge Health Alliance, 2Wright State University, 3Mount Auburn Hospital, 4Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 5State University of New York at Buffalo, 6Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Background: The Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST) simulator is a virtual reality system that was designed to train the hybrid-NOTES technique. Transfer of skill acquired while training on the VTEST was measured in a near-real cholecystectomy procedure staged in the EASIE-R model.

Methods: Sixteen medical students were divided randomly and evenly into 2 groups: Control, Training. All subjects performed the cholecystectomy procedure on the VTEST simulator to establish a baseline (pre-test). The training group received 15 training sessions, over a period of 3 consecutive weeks, consisting of 5 trials per session or as many trials as can be accomplished in one hour, whichever was achieved first. At the end of the training period, all subjects performed one trial on the VTEST simulator (post-test), and again 2 to 3 weeks later (retention test). Two months after that, subjects performed the hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy procedure on an EASIE-R model. Performance with the EASIE-R simulator was video-recorded, and three tasks within the cholecystectomy procedure were isolated for evaluation: clipping, cutting, and dissecting the gallbladder. Objective performance measures, such as time and error, were extracted from the videos by two independent reviewers, while subjective performance was scored by four expert surgeons who were blinded to the training conditions. Expert reviewers used a modified version of the Operative Performance Rating System by the American Board of Surgery and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool.

Results: There was no difference in task completion time between the control and training groups, (t(10)=1.045, p=.161) in the cutting and clipping tasks. However, there was a significant difference in the number of errors, t(10)=-1.847, p=.047. There was no difference in subjective performance between the training groups for the clipping and cutting tasks. In the gallbladder dissection task, however, there was a statistical significance in “instrument handling” based on one of the surgeons’ ratings (t(14)=1.919, p=.03), and a statistical significance in “time and motion” based on another surgeon’s rating (t(14)=2.118, p=.03).

Conclusions: Results indicate that 3 weeks of training on the VTEST simulator did not allow the subjects to transfer their learned skills equally to the near-real environment, even though they retained the skills when tested for retention. This new insight suggests that modification of the training method for different types of surgical skills may be warranted to optimize their transfer to the real environment.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86827

Program Number: P320

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

50

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals