• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Is an Effective Treatment for Gerd Symptoms

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Is an Effective Treatment for Gerd Symptoms

William J Haberlin, MD, Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD, PhD, Amanda L Walters, MS, Keith Gersin, MD, Timothy Kuwada, MD. Section of Bariatric Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte North Carolina.

Introduction:  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an increasingly popular and effective bariatric procedure.  However, it’s effectiveness in treating GERD has been questioned. Some studies have even demonstrated worsening GERD symptoms. Our objective was to investigate the effect of LSG on GERD symptoms (GS) in our patient population.

Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of a single surgeon’s, LSG series (excluding revisions) between 2008 and 2013.  Routine PPI’s were not used postoperatively. GERD symptoms and medications were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Symptoms were categorized as either resolved (asymptomatic off medications), improved, or worse. Patient demographics presence and repair of hiatal hernia, and %EWL were also recorded. All patients with at minimum of 3 months follow up were included.

Results: 226 LSG met inclusion criteria. Follow up at 3,6 and 12 months was 71%, 61% and 50% respectively. Demographics: mean age 45.0±10.1, gender: 78.8% female, preoperative BMI 43.8±5.6. LOS: 2.2±0.7 days. The mean OR time was 74.7±30.2 minutes, 21% had a combined hiatal hernia repair.. There were no leaks or perioperative reoperations. 44.6 % patients had preop GS. At 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery 72%, 82% and 82% respectively had improvement or resolution of their GS. At 12 months follow up 2 patients had developed new GS (asymptomatic preop) and 6 (8.2%) had worsening of their preop GS. There were no differences at any time point for operative time, EBL, LOS and percent excess weight loss associated with improvement in GERD (all p>0.05). At 3 months those with improved reflux were more like to undergo hiatal hernia repair (29.2% vs 14.0%; p=0.017. However, these were not significantly different at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion: The vast majority (82%) of patients in our study with pre-existing GERD symptoms had improvement or resolution of their GS after LSG. Only 2.7% of asymptomatic patients developed GS after LSG. Our findings indicate that LSG rarely leads to new onset or worsening of GERD based on patient reported symptoms . Further studies are required to determine the endoscopic and quantitate (pH study) changes in GERD after LSG.

gerd outcomes 1 year after LSG
 

resolved/ improved

 

worse P-value
%EBW loss 51.1 54.4 0.636
Preop BMI  51.36 55.71 0.521
AGE 43.6 43.3 0.498
% female 86% 100%  0.179
%caucasian 59% 50%  0.764

 

View Poster

68

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals