• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Staple Line Leaks: Does Bougie Size Matter?

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Staple Line Leaks: Does Bougie Size Matter?

Ryan S Lohre, BSc, Ahmer A Karimuddin, MD, Bao Tang, MD, Bradley J Amson, MD, Samaad Malik, MD, MSc. University of British Columbia

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for treatment of morbid obesity remains highly technically variable (bougie size, staple distance from pylorus, and staple length). This study evaluates clinical outcomes in patients receiving LSG over a one year period and investigates utilizing a bougie size of ≥40F reduces complication rates.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective analysis of all LSGs performed (2009-2014) by three bariatric surgeons at a single center. Patients included: age>18 years, BMI>35 kg/m2 with co-morbidities and BMI>40 kg/m2, while patients with revisional surgery were excluded. Preoperative patient parameters, excess of weight loss percentage (%EWL) up to one year, and surgical variables were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Table 1. Bougie sizes <40F and ≥40F with mean values for patient parameters and complication rates.
Bougie N M:F Mean Age (SD) Mean Preoperative BMI (SD) %EWL 1 Month (SD) %EWL 3 Months (SD) %EWL 6 Months (SD) %EWL 1 Year (SD) Complications (n) Staple Line Leaks (n)
<40F 122 19:103 51.7 (9.87) 49.5 (8.17) 20.6 (8.74) 28.3 (13.4) 35.7 (6.33) 51.3 (14.1) 13 3
≥40F 90 15:75 48.3 (10.8) 44.3 (6.22) 13.6 (12.0) 28.3 (13.6) 40.5 (18.7) 44.8 (9.27) 0 0
P <0.05 <0.0001 <0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 0.0008 >0.05
Total (34F – 42F) 212 34:178 50.1 (10.6) 47.2 (7.9) 16.7 (11.2) 29.0 (14.1) 38.6 (15.0) 49.6 (13.1) 13 3

Two hundred and twelve patients were included. Complications occurred in 6.0% of patients (n=13): 2.8% incisional hernias (n=6), 1.4% staple line leaks (n=3), 0.9% strictures (n=2), 0.9% acute renal failure (n=2), and 0.1% reflux (n=1). Total complication rates and staple line leaks were stratified towards preoperative age (p>0.05), gender (p>0.05) and super-obesity (BMI≥50 kg/m2, n=65) (p>0.05). Bougie size <40F (n=122) to ≥40F (n=90) was compared for predicting total complication rates (p=0.0008) and staple line leaks (p>0.05). Staple start distance from the pylorus <6cm (n=85) was compared to ≥6cm (n=120) for total complication rates (p=0.0001) and for staple line leaks (p=0.0698). Staple heights: 3.5mm and 4.8mm (n=26) vs 3.5mm staples (n=185) alone were compared for total complications (p=0.045) and staple line leaks (p>0.05). Total complication rates and staple line leaks was stratified towards a mean OR time of 75.6 (±29.9) minutes (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION: LSG is a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity. Surgical characteristics of bougie size ≥40F, staple start distance from the pylorus ≥6cm, and use of only 3.5mm staples were all significant factors of total complication rates, with a staple start distance ≥6cm being nearly significant in predicting staple line leaks. Bougie size ≥40F provides comparable weight loss to bougie sizes <40F in the short term while having less morbidity.

137

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals