• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Long Term Clinical Outcomes

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Long Term Clinical Outcomes

Ayman Obeid, MD, Joshua W Long, MD, Manasi Kakade, MPH, Clements H Ronald, MD, Stahl Richard, MD, Jayleen Grams, MD PhD. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University

 

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery remains the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) continues to be the preferred operation. However, data on long term outcomes is lacking, especially regarding the durability of the improvement or resolution of obesity-associated comorbidities. The aim of this study was to determine the long term outcomes after LRYGB in terms of weight reduction, complications, and progress of obesity-associated comorbidities.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted of all patients who had LRYGB between 2001 and 2006. Only patients who had a postoperative clinic visit at ≤ 2 years and at ≥ 5 years were included in the study. Data collected included demographics, % excess weight loss (%EWL), complications, and improvement or resolution of comorbidities [diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension (HTN), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and dyslipidemia (Lipids)]. Data were analyzed using SAS (version 9.2) and SPSS (version 16) statistical software.
RESULTS: There were 770 patients who underwent LRYGB at UAB from 2001-2006. Of these, 172 patients met inclusion criteria (148 females and 24 males) with a median age of 41.5 years (range, 19-34 years) and median preoperative BMI of 46 kg/m² (range, 34-71 kg/m²). Median short and long term follow up was 14 months (range, 6-27 months) and 75 months (range, 55-119 months), respectively. Short term %EWL was 71% vs a long term %EWL of 65% (p <0.005). Of the 172 patients, 77 patients experienced 103 complications [internal hernia, n=33 (19%); cholecystectomy, n=22 (18%); marginal ulcer, n=22 (13%); anastomotic stricture, n=19 (11%); and others, n=7 (4%)]. Median time to develop a complication was 29 months (range, 0.1-101 months). Clinical outcomes with regard to obesity-associated comorbidities are listed in the table below. There was no significant difference in improvement or resolution of comorbid conditions in the short vs long term follow up.

Comorbidity (N) Short Term Long Term
N Same  Improved Resolved N Same     Improved Resolved
T2DM (77) 65 2 (3%) 2 (3%) 61 (94%) 77 4 (5%) 12 (9%) 63 (82%)
HTN (110) 88 3 (3%) 22 (25%) 63 (72%) 110 7 (6%) 31 (28%) 72 (66%)
OSA (123) 85 5 (6%) 8 (9%) 72 (85%) 103 13 (7%) 10 (10%) 85 (83%)
Lipids (65) 51 2 (3%) 12 (24%) 37 (73%) 65 6 (9%) 19 (29%) 40 (62%)

CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a statistically significant difference in %EWL between short and long term follow up, both arms showed a clinically relevant %EWL and both results were statistically significant when compared to preoperative values. The improvement and resolution of comorbidities was also sustained in long-term follow up. Thus, LRYGB resulted in significant improvement in clinical outcomes that were durable in long term follow up.
 


Session Number: PDIST – Posters of Distinction
Program Number: P014
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search