• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

LAPAROSCOPIC PARENCHYMAL SPARING LIVER RESECTIONS — ARE THEY FEASIBLE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Jennifer A Kalil, MD, Erik Schadde, MD, FACS, FEBS. Rush University Medical Center

Introduction: Liver resection with preservation of as much liver parenchyma as possible is called parenchymal sparing hepatectomy (PSH). PSH has been shown to improve overall survival by increasing the re-resection rate in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and recurrence. The caudal-cranial perspective in laparoscopy makes the cranial segments (2, 4a, 7, and 8) more difficult to access. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze feasibility, safety, morbidity, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic PSH. 

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. A search strategy was published with the PROSPERO registry. A systematic review was conducted on all cases reported, they were categorized by area of resection and quantitative meta-analysis of operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and R0 resection was performed. 

Results: Of the 351 studies screened for relevance, 48 studies were selected. Because interventions or endpoints were noncontributory or reporting incomplete, 38 were excluded. Only 10 publications remained, reporting data from 579 patients who underwent laparoscopic PSH. The highest Oxford evidence level was 2b and selective reporting bias was common due to single center and non-controlled reports. Among them, 132 (21.5%) resections were in the cranial segments 2 (1.1%), 4a (5.2%), 7 (6%), and 8 (9.1%), which previously would have required laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomies or sectorectomies. The most common tumor type was CRLM (58%) and the second most common tumor type was hepatocellular carcinoma (16%). Feasibility of laparoscopic PSH was 93%, conversion rate was 7%, and complications were seen in 17% of cases. No perioperative mortality was reported. No standardized reporting format for complications was used across studies. Meta-analysis revealed a weighted average operating time of 385 minutes, estimated blood loss of 463 cc, and length of stay of 8 days. R0 resections were achieved in 91% of cases. 

Conclusion: Laparoscopic PSH of difficult to reach liver tumors are feasible with acceptable conversion and complication rate, but relatively long operating times and relatively high blood loss. In future studies, data on long term survival and specific tumor type recurrence should be reported and bias reduced. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86327

Program Number: P537

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

74

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2018 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons