• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass in Adolescents: a Prospective Analysis of Dynamic of Weight Loss.

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass in Adolescents: a Prospective Analysis of Dynamic of Weight Loss.

Piotr Gorecki, MD, Alok Aggarwal, MD, Elizabeth Lax, MD, Anthony Tortolani, MD, Wojciech Gorecki, MD. Department of Surgery, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY

 

Introduction: With an epidemic of obesity among American children and adolescents, and growing popularity of bariatric surgery in adults, little data focusing on dynamics of weight loss and potential outcome differences in these groups of bariatric patients is available.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dynamic of weight loss in adolescent patients (AP) undergoing laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and compare the results with the older patient (OP) population undergoing the same procedure.

Materials and Methods: We present our experience with 41 adolescent (18 to 21 years of age) patients who underwent LRYGB at our institution between August 2001 and August of 2011. All patients met the NIH criteria for bariatric surgery and were operated by a single surgeon (PG). All patients were evaluated preoperatively in the multidisciplinary setting that included pediatrician. The data were collected prospectively. The weight loss patterns for both groups were measured at the following intervals: excess weight loss at one week, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. In addition, age groups were compared in regard to distribution of weight loss (percent of excess BMI loss at 1 -year – EBMI) in 5 distribution groups. Group I included patients with EBMI loss of < 25%, group II – between 26 and 50 EBMI%, group III- 51% -75% of EBMI loss, group IV – 75%-100% EBMI loss and group V >100 % EBMI loss.

Results: Out of 652 patients who underwent LRYGB, 41 were between ages of 18 and 21 (6.72%, mean age 19.75). There were 31 females (76%) and 10 males (24%) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 49.86 kg/m2 (range 41-64). All operations were completed laparoscopicaly with no intraoperative complications. Mean length of hospital stay was similar for the two groups (2.89 days for AP vs. 3,1 days for OP, p=0.585). There was one (3.2%) major postoperative complication an 3 minor complications in the AP group. There were no long-term disabilities and no mortalities in either group. At 1-year follow up, the EBMI loss was 72.67% for AP and 75.36% for OP group and was similar (p=0.51). In addition, at one year follow up, the distribution of weight loss in both patient population was as follow: Group I contained 4.2% AP vs. 0% OP patients, group II -12.5% vs. 9.6%, group II 37.5% vs. 43.6%, group IV 33.3% vs. 38.0% and Group V 12.5% vs. 8.8%. There was no significant differences in weight loss patterns in the two groups (p=0.798). Comparable weight loss pattern extended up to 5 years after surgery with 5-year follow up BMI 32.67 for AP and 30.38 for OP (P=0.492).

Conclusion: The dynamic distribution of the pattern of weight loss up to 5 year after LRYGB was similar in both groups. The results of bariatric surgery in adolescent patients appear to parallel those in adult population.


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P498
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search