• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Super Morbidly Obese Patients

Muhammad Asad Khan, MD, Roman Grinberg, MD, Stelin Johnson, RPAC, John N Afthinos, MD, Karen E Gibbs, MD. Staten Island University Hospital

 

OBJECTIVE:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the accepted standard of care for the treatment of acute cholecystitis for over a decade. There is ongoing debate whether it is safe in the super morbidly obese patient with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. The current study compared the outcomes of super-obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) patients undergoing open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS:

We obtained data from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) on 1062 super-obese patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 who underwent open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2007 and 2009. The parameters analyzed included age, gender, co-morbid conditions, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score, operative time, postoperative complications, re-operation, length of hospital stay and mortality.

RESULTS:

Among 1062 patients, 912 (85.9%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy while 150 (14.1%) had open cholecystectomy. Mean age of the study population was 43.1 years and 80% were female. Among two groups, patients underwent laparoscopic procedures had significantly lower incidence of diabetes (20% vs. 36%), COPD (2.2% vs. 5.3%), HTN (44% vs. 66%) and bleeding disorder (2.9% vs. 20%). Operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopic group as compared to open group (81 ± 40 min vs. 145±68 min and 1.7 ± 3.2 days vs. 9.2 ± 15.5 days, respectively). Nine patients (6%) in open cholecystectomy group underwent return to OR compare to only 1% patients in laparoscopic group. Similarly superficial, deep, organ space infection and wound dehiscence was significantly higher in open group, Patients in open cholecystectomy group had higher incidence of pneumonia, re-intubation, failure to wean, UTI, MI, cardiac arrest, sepsis and septic shock. Perioperative mortality was 3.3% in open cholecystectomy patients as compared to 0.2% in laparoscopic patients (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safer option for super-obese patients and should be attempted in order to potentially avoid significant peri-operative complications in this high risk group.
 

Complications

Open cholecystectomy

N=150

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy P
Perioperative Complications
Reintubation 8 (5.3%) 4 (0.4%) .001
Failure to wean 11 (7.3%) 3 (0.3%) <.001
Progressive renal failure 7 (4.7%) 2 (0.2%) <.001
Urinary tract infection 4 (2.7%) 5 (0.5%) .027
Cardiac arrest 3 (2%) 0 (0%) .003
Myocardial infarction 2 (1.3%) 1 (0.1%) .054
Sepsis 6 (4%) 1 (0.1%) <.001
Septic Shock 10 (6.7%) 2 (0.2%) <.001
Pneumonia 8 (5.3%) 4 (0.4%) <.001

 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P481
View Poster

4,764

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2012 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons