• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Laparo-endoscopic Single Site Surgery (less) for Intra-Abdominal Solid Organs: A Case Control Study.

Laparo-endoscopic Single Site Surgery (less) for Intra-Abdominal Solid Organs: A Case Control Study.

Iris J Parrao-alcantara, UNDERGRADUATED MEDICAL DOCTOR, Xeily Zarate, MD, Juan Pablo Pantoja, MD, Mauricio Sierra, MD, David Velazquez-fernandez, MD PHD, Miguel F Herrera, MD PHD. Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubirán

 

BACKGROUND: One of the most promising uses of LESS are surgical procedures requiring organ retrieval such as splenectomy, adrenalectomy and pancreatic resections. The aim of the present study was to analyze our initial results with LESS in these 3 surgical procedures, using a case control design.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent LESS at our institution between 2010 and 2011 were reviewed. Exclusively three surgical techniques were considered for the study: splenectomy, adrenalectomy, and pancreatic resection. These were considered the case group, while controls were patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy for the same diagnosis. Case and controls were matched according to their preoperative diagnosis. Main outcome variables were: surgical time, conversion rate, cure of the disease, and operative complications. Preliminary statistical analysis was performed according to the variable scaling using SPSS v. 13.0. Statistical significance was considered with a p value was lesser than 0.05.
RESULTS: Nineteen cases were included (10 splenectomies, 4 adrenalectomies, and 5 pancreatic resections). All splenectomies were performed for Idiopathic thrombocitopenic purpura. Adrenalectomies were indicated for the treatment of benign hyperfunctioning or non -functional adrenocortical tumors. Insulinoma was the surgical indication for all pancreatic resections. Surgical approach for splenectomy and adrenalectomy was lateral subcostal, and anterior for all pancreatic resections. There were no conversions. A group of 16 matched controls (11 splenectomies and 5 adrenalectomies) met inclusion criteria. Patients with pancreatic resections were all females. Three distal pancreatectomies and 2 enucleations were performed. Mean operative time was 240.4±62.67 min. Two patients developed a pancreatic fistula (1 “A” and 1 “B”). Comparative results for splenectomies and adrenalectomies are shown below. Although the statistical power is limited, there were no statistical differences among cases and controls.

SPLENECTOMY LESS (10) Laparoscopic (11)
Female, n (%) 8 (80%) 8 (72.7%)
Surgical time, min 155.9 ± 47.22 125.9 ± 47.94
Complete/Parcial/No response, n 8 / 2 / 0 9 / 1 / 1
Complications, n 1 Incisional hernia 0
ADRENALECTOMY LESS (4) Laparoscopic (5)
Female, n (%) 4 (100%) 5 (100%)
Surgical time, min 166.6 ± 41.63 144.4 ± 65.32
Cushing/Conn/Non-functioning, n 1 / 1 / 2 0 / 0 / 5
Complications, n 0 0

CONCLUSIONS: LESS in splenectomy, adrenalectomy, and pancreatic resection for insulinoma offers the well-known cosmetic advantages of the technique without deleterious effects on clinical outcomes when compared with conventional laparoscopy. Moreover, LESS did not involve a longer surgical time in this series. Therefore we believe that LESS is an optimal alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, with improved cosmetic results and similar outcomes.
 


Session Number: SS07 – Solid Organ
Program Number: S046

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search