• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Is There Room for Improvement in the Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Cholangiogram?

Is There Room for Improvement in the Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Cholangiogram?

S El Djouzi, MD, A Y Zemlyak, MD, V B Tsirline, MD, B Hammond, Michael T Lavelle, MD, Amanda Walters, MS, D Stefanidis, MD PhD, T B Heniford, MD. Carolinas Medical Center

 

BACKGROUND
Post-cholecystectomy ERCP is commonly performed for abnormal findings of the intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) interpreted by the operating surgeons. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of IOC for diagnosing choledocholithiasis and predicting the need for post-operative ERCP.
METHODS
A retrospective review of patients who underwent postoperative ERCP for the identification of a filling defect during IOC at an academic institution between 2006 and 2011 was performed. Patient demographics, IOC and ERCP findings were recorded. The surgeons’ interpretation of the IOC was compared to that of the radiologist’s and to the findings of the ERCP to determine the accuracy of intraoperative and radiographic interpretation.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven cases that had an abnormal filling defect during IOC and a postoperative ERCP were identified and reviewed. Patient age was 42±16 years, BMI was 30.5±7.5 kg/m2, 74% were females, and 55% Caucasians. Conversion rate was 1% and length of stay 4.6±2.9 days. All IOCs were reviewed by a radiologist who confirmed a filling defect in only 55% of patients. Subsequent ERCP revealed stones in 52.5%, sludge in 18%, ampullary stenosis in 8%, and no abnormal findings in 22%. The accuracy of the surgeon’s interpretation of IOC was 73% and that of the radiologist 78% (p>0.05). In cases where glucagon was used (N=25), the accuracy was improved (88.4% versus 67%; p=0.04). Unsuccessful CBD exploration requiring postoperative ERCP was performed in 12 patients; challenging anatomy, inability to access the CBD due to tortuosity of the cystic duct, or inability to retrieve the stones through the cystic duct were reasons for failure. The subsequent ERCP revealed stones in 2 patients, sludge in 1 patient, and normal findings in 9 patients. CBD dilatation (size > 6mm) was seen in 59.2% of the entire sample, whereas 79.6% of the patients with abnormal ERCP (stones, sludge, or stenosis) had a dilated CBD. The CBD was dilated in 64.7% of ERCPs with stones, in 37.5% of ERCPs with ampulla stenosis, and in 23% of the ERCPs with sludge.
CONCLUSION
The accuracy of IOC as interpreted by the operating surgeon during cholecystectomy approached 80% and was not significantly different than that of the radiologist and may be increased by using glucagon. The use of transcystic duct exploration, intra-operative ultrasound, or post-operative MRCP as an adjunct to IOC prior to ERCP needs to be studied and may reduce the incidence of negative ERCPs.


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P399
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search