• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / IS THERE A GENDER BIAS IN THE ADVANCEMENT TO SAGES LEADERSHIP?

IS THERE A GENDER BIAS IN THE ADVANCEMENT TO SAGES LEADERSHIP?

Teodora C Dumitra, MD, Roshni Alam, Julio F Fiore, PhD, Juan Mata, MD, Gerald M Fried, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Melina C Vassiliou, MD, MED, FRCSC, Carmen Mueller, MD, FRCSC, MEd, FACS, Lawrence Lee, MD, PhD, Liane S Feldman, MD, FRCSC, FACS. Mcgill University

Introduction: The proportion of women in surgery has risen significantly yet there are disproportionately fewer women in positions of leadership within academic surgery. The career trajectory of women in surgical societies has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in the advancement of women and men within SAGES leadership.

Methods: A retrospective audit of all SAGES committee members (CM) from 1981-2016 was performed. The gender distribution of the overall SAGES membership was only available from 2010-2016. Members participating in more than one committee were analyzed as a single entry. Leadership positions beyond CM included Committee Chair/Co-chair, Board of Governors and Executive Committee. Three distinct phenomena potentially affecting advancement of women were investigated: pipeline, by determining the rate of change in female CMs compared to overall SAGES membership over time; sticky floors, by comparing advancement beyond CM by gender; and glass-ceiling, by analyzing the promotion trajectory and time to leadership positions between genders. The analysis was performed from 1992 onward with the first female committee member. Statistical analysis comparing trends over time was performed using Kendall-tau.

Results: Of the 15,717 committee membership positions during the study period, 8003 unique CM were analyzed. Of these, 1,093 became chairs/co-chairs(13.7%), 950 reached the Board of Governors(11.9%) and 147 attained the Executive Committee(1.8%). Overall, women represented 14.7% of CMs, 14.7% of chairs/co-chairs, 15.2% of the Board and 15% of the executive committee, with one woman president. The proportion of female CMs has significantly increased over time from 3% in 1992 to 23% in 2016(p-trend<0.001). A similar proportion of women and men advanced beyond CM (2.4%vs2.9%,p=0.350), with no difference in time to advancement (Chair p=0.381, Board p=0.519, Executive p=0.829). From 2010-2016, the proportion of female CMs increased at a faster pace than the growth of overall SAGES female members (p=0.019). Moreover, from 2012 onwards, the proportion of female CM, chairs/co-chairs and Board members has surpassed the overall proportion of female members. Female executives also surpassed the latter in 2016 (29%vs16%). A similar proportion of men and women “skipped ranks” to reach the Board and/or Executive (34%vs20%,p=0.268).

Conclusion: The proportion of women in leadership positions within SAGES is higher than in the overall membership, and there were no differences in the advancement of female committee members to leadership positions. While these data are encouraging, SAGES should continue to foster the advancement of female surgeons for leadership positions. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 84948

Program Number: S105

Presentation Session: Diversity and Innovation Session

Presentation Type: Podium

51

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals