• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Is the Risk of Operating on Acute Cholecystitis Too Great? a Comparison of National Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Emily Benham, Samuel W Ross, MD, MPH, Ciara R Huntington, MD, Peter E Fischer, MD, MS, John M Green, MD, Bradley W Thomas, MD, B. Todd Heniford, MD, A. Britton Christmas, MD, Ronald F Sing, DO. Carolinas Medical Center

Introduction: Many HPB experts and the Tokyo guidelines recommend delaying cholecystectomy for advanced acute cholecystitis, given an increased risk of complications, and operating when in a chronic phase. Therefore, our goal was to use national data to examine risk of post-operative complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute vs. chronic cholecystitis.

Methods and Procedures: The ACS NSQIP database was queried for all LC from 2005-2013. Two cohorts were defined by diagnosis codes acute cholecystitis (AC) chronic cholecystitis (CC). Univariate tests were used to compare the cohorts. Multivariate analysis was performed for outcomes controlling for age, BMI, gender, diabetes, smoking, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conversion rate and common bile duct injury are not tracked in NSQIP.

Results: There were 145,644,520 LC: 44,436 with IOC and 1,168 with common bile duct exploration.  LC was performed for AC in 46,189 cases and 99,455 for CC. Complication rates were low: wound complication 0.77%, intra-abdominal abscess 0.45%, reoperation 0.94%, readmission 4.40%, and 30 day mortality 0.23%. The AC cohort had older, more male, higher BMI, more inpatient, diabetics, and higher CCI; p<0.001 for all. Univariate outcomes are reported in the table, and all complications, except for superficial SSI, and mortality were higher in the AC cohort. On multivariate analysis, LC for AC had an increased odds of reoperation (OR, CI: 1.36, 1.16-1.60), readmission (1.33, 1.23-1.43), intra-abdominal abscess (2.19, 1.87-2.56), and 30 day mortality (1.78, 1.42-2.22) when compared to LC for CC.

Conclusions: Rates of 30 day complications are low for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but, they are slightly increased when performed for acute compared to chronic cholecystitis.  Surgeons and patients should balance these minimally increased risks with the cost, discomfort, and healthcare resources associated with delaying cholecystectomy.

96

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2016 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons