• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Influence of pH, dose volume, human pancreatic juice and bile on 64Cu absorption from the rat closed duojejunal loop.

Paul Tasker, FRCS, Harbans Sharma, MSc, PhD, DSc, Joan Braganza, DSc, FRCP, Maynard Case, BSc, PhD. Manchester Royal Infirmary.

INTRODUCTION:  In the rat closed duodenal-jejunal loop, rat pancreatic juice (PJ) inhibited 64Cu absorption.  Pancreatic insufficiency in man was found not to increase 64Cu absorption in man, so the rat closed duodenal-jejunal loop was re-examined testing for pH influences and repeating the 64Cu 2h instillation with test solutions. 

METHOD: Using Antimony electrodes, the resting pH values in the loop lumen were measured and the influence of both alkaline and acid single-shot buffers examined.  The loop management was modified to examine the influence of dose volume.  Human pancreatic juice and bile were used as test solutions. 

RESULTS: In the rat duodenal-jejunal loop, single-shot test solutions had only transitory effects on pH. The volume of dose influenced the amount 64Cu absorbed from the loop.  The procedure was therefore modified.  Although diluted human bile decreased 64Cu absorption by 62% as before, human pancreatic juice injected into the loop did not influence absorption either in the original loop or the modified loop.

A sample of some of the results described:

Test solution            Dose     Liver           Total              Liver                 Total
                             Volume Mean ± S.D. Mean ± S.D. Mean ± S.D. Mean ± S.D.
                                ml        % of dose                         % of gut cpm/ G / cm 
 

original loop using flush-on volume: 

0.9% saline(n = 4) 0.5+ ml  3.02 ± 0.22  7.40 ± 0.66   37.1± 11.3  90.0 ± 22.7
Human PJ  (n = 8) 0.5+ ml  2.48 ± 0.91  6.18 ± 1.78   38.2 ± 9.2    99.1± 23.5
 

modified loop with exact volume placement 

0.9% saline  (n = 3) 0.5 ml  1.16 ± 0.25   3.31 ± 0.71   11.4 ± 0.9     32.5 ± 2.7
Human PJ    (n = 3) 0.5 ml  1.18 ± 0.10   3.55 ± 0.46   13.3 ± 2.3     39.6 ± 3.5
0.9% saline  (n = 3)1.0  ml  2.37 ± 0.55   6.67 ± 1.60   27.2 ± 7.8     76.7 ± 23.5
Human PJ    (n = 2)1.0  ml  2.48 ± 0.36   7.42 ± 0.33   36.2 ± 4.7    108.1 ± 3.3
 

                                                         Liver                Carcass          Total

0.9% saline  (n = 3)    1.0  ml      2.06 ± 0.49     4.56 ± 0.56       6.62 ± 0.92
Bile solution (n = 3)    1.0  ml      0.66 ± 0.17    1.83 ±  0.25       3.49 ± 0.40
 

0.9% saline (n = 12)   0.5+, 1.0  2.53 ± 0.58                               6.84 ± 0.97
Human PJ    (n = 10)   0.5+, 1.0  2.48 ± 0.81                               6.46 ± 1.64 (n=9)
 

CONCLUSION:

The closed loop had a pH in the alkaline pH range, and neither acid nor alkaline buffers had more than a slight or transient effect on the resulting pH.  Using a modified loop, 64Cu absorption at one ml was twice that at 0.5 ml. Higher dose volumes showed no further increment. The effect was due to increased gut surface contact. The results with 0.5-ml plus the flush-on volume and one ml were very similar. 

 Human pancreatic juice did not produced the inhibition in 64Cu absorption,which was seen with rat pancreatic juice, either in  the original or modified protocol.  This may relate to reduction in protein content of the juice (e.g. metallothionein). Human gall bladder bile however, even with a one in four dilution, with saline, inhibited 64Cu absorption to approximately one third of the control value.
 

View Poster

89

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2014 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons