• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Increased visceral adiposity fails to predict postoperative complications in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients

Salvatore Docimo, Joshua S Winder, Brandon S Dudeck, Brandon Labarge, Ann M Rogers. Penn State Hershey Medical Center

INTRODUCTION

Worse surgical outcomes in obese patients may be explained by a systemic pro-inflammatory  response;  adipose tissue  releases  inflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor-α , interleukin-6 , and leptin [3-5]. Quantitative analysis of visceral adiposity using computerized tomographic (CT)-based measurements has been evaluated as an  effective means of assessing obesity in patients [6-7].  Our objective was to introduce a quantitative measure to study the effect of visceral obesity on  post-operative morbidity and mortality  in patients undergoing Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB).

 METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing RYGB from 2006 – 2013 was performed with institutional review board approval.  All patients who underwent CT  of the abdomen  within 30 days postoperatively were included.  Patient demographics, CT  findings, length of stay (LOS) and complications were evaluated. Preoperative body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Radiologic measurements of adiposity were obtained from preoperative CT scans using OsiriX DICOM (2015) viewer software.  Visceral fat areas (VFA) and subcutaneous fat areas (SFA) were measured from a single axial slice at the level of L4-L5 intervertebral space.  The CT attenuation level to delineate the regions of adipose tissue was set using Hounsfield units of -190 to -30 [11].  The VFA and  SFA were then  measured. The VFA to SFA ratio (V/S) was calculated..  The currently defined obesity threshold is V/S ≥ 0.4 [11,12].  Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Chi-square and Student’s T-test evaluations.

 RESULTS:

51 patients were evaluated.  Twenty-six  had a V/S < 0.4 (average V/S ratio 0.27) and 25  had a V/S ratio > 0.4 (average V/S ratio 0.56; p=0.0001). For the V/S < 0.4 group, the average age and BMI were 42.5 years, 42.98 kg/m2, with 5 (19.2%) males, and 21 (80.8%) females. For the V/S > 0.4 group, the average age and BMI were 49.96 years and 44.58 kg/m2, with 11 (44%) males and 14 (56%) females. The difference in age was significant (p=0.0094).  No significant differences in the postoperative complications (p=0328), LOS (p=0.388), or number of surgical interventions (p=0.679) were noted.

 CONCLUSIONS:

Evaluation of  visceral adiposity among bariatric patients undergoing postoperative CT scans failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in complication rate, length of stay or rate of surgical intervention. Given the current safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery, visceral fat alone is an unlikely marker for increased complications in bariatric patients.

78

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2016 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons