• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Impact of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication On Subjective and Objective GERD Indices: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature

Impact of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication On Subjective and Objective GERD Indices: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature

Mark R Wendling, MD, W. Scott Melvin, MD, Kyle A Perry, MD. Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

 

INTRODUCTION: Since 2007, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) has been employed for endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Full thickness polypropylene H-fasteners create a serosa to serosa gastroesophageal plication to create a mechanical barrier to reflux. Multiple cohort studies in the United States and Europe have examined the effect of TIF on subjective and objective measures of gastroesophageal reflux. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the worldwide experience with TIF to date and to assess the effect of this procedure on patient symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.
METHODS: A systematic search of the literature, published to date in English and indexed in MEDLINE and PubMed, was carried out in August 2011 using the following keywords: GERD + endoluminal treatment, ELF, TIF, Esophyx, endoscopic fundoplication, reflux + endoluminal treatment, incisionless fundoplication. Studies were selected on the basis of availability of data on at least two of the following parameters: esophageal manometry, pH study, symptom scores, and medication usage. Statistical analysis was performed on the results from twelve cohort studies. With average pre- and post-EsophyX scores for each study available, statistical evaluation was performed using a weighted paired t-test. When more than one post-treatment score was obtained, the last measurement was included in this analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.
RESULTS: The literature search yielded 12 cohort studies containing 358 unique patients with a mean follow-up interval of 8.7 (±5.1) months. No randomized controlled trials of TIF have been published to date. The subjective and objective outcome data are summarized in the table below. The major complication rate was 3.9%. Also, 9.4% of patients required further treatment with either a second TIF procedure or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. TIF significantly improved GERD health related quality of life score (GERD-HRQL) and 75% of patients did not require PPI therapy after 9 months. While TIF appears to decrease esophageal acid exposure and increase LES pressure, these differences did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: TIF improves typical GERD symptoms as measured by GERD-HRQL and eliminates the need for PPI therapy in a significant number of patients at short term follow-up. There is insufficient data to demonstrate that these symptomatic improvements are associated with significant changes in esophageal acid exposure or changes in esophageal sphincter pressure. TIF may provide symptomatic improvement in select patients. Prospective randomized controlled trials and cohort studies with long term follow-up are required to provide further assessment of the efficacy and durability of this procedure.

Table 1: Subjective and Objective measures of GERD Indices after TIF
Measurement No. Studies Total Patients Average Decrease Mean F/U (months) P-value
GERD-HRQL Score 9 325 20.6 8.2 0.0001
RSI Score 2 133 23.3 6.8 0.1026

Continued PPI use

9 320 25.4% 9.2 0.0001
Hiatal Hernia Incidence 3 63 36.0% 7.5 0.2423
Mean LES Pressure 3 103 -5.0 mmHg 10.1 0.0762
Esophageal Acid Exposure Time (% time pH <4) 3 99 2.8% 10.0 0.2027
DeMeester Score 3 107 7.7 10.0 0.2008
Number of Acid Refluxes 4 61 22.1 6.7 0.3066

 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P250
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search