• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Impact of Right Nephrectomy on Outcomes of Renal Function and Complications in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-center Experience

Impact of Right Nephrectomy on Outcomes of Renal Function and Complications in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Since 2001, we have been trying to establish the technique of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN). In general, the left kidney from a living donor is preferred for renal transplantation because of its longer renal vein. However, not all potential donors have a right kidney which is anatomically and functionally conducive to left nephrectomy. Also, several series of studies have shown initially high rates of complications and graft loss with right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. In order to assess the safety, feasibility and usefulness of right RPLDN, we reviewed and compared the outcomes of right and left RPLDN. METHODS: Two hundred seventy six patients underwent live donor renal transplantation with allografts procured by RPLDN at our institute. Of these, 13 (4.7%) cases were of right sided RPLDN. Study variables included operative time, time to retrieval of the kidney, blood loss, warm ischemia time (WIT), hospital stay, number and length of renal vessels, graft function and complications. RESULTS: The indication for right RPLDN included renal cysts (n = 3), renal artery aneurysm (n = 3), inferior right renal function (n =2), renal artery stenosis (n = 2), right renal stone (n = 1), anomalous left renal artery (n = 1), or previous intra-peritoneal surgery on the left side (n = 1). No significant differences were found between the right and left RPLDN group regarding operative time (325}70 vs 312}73 min), time to retrieval of the kidney (260}72 vs. 246}71 min), blood loss (50 vs. 45 ml), hospital stay (4.5}1.3 vs. 4.1}1.7 days) or number of renal arteries (1.3}0.6 vs. 1.3}0.6). Despite statistically significantly increased WIT (6.0}1.9 vs. 5.0}1.7 min) and decreased renal vein length (1.8}0.4 vs. 3.9}0.8 cm), no patient showed relatively slow graft function or required hemodialysis after transplantation due to acute tubular necrosis. Subcutaneous emphysema (n =1) and postoperative bleeding (n = 1) occurred in right RPLDN patients. Venous extension was required in 3 patients due to a short renal vein. The saphenous vein was used for venous extension. No patient undergoing RPLDN required open conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Right RPLDN provided similar outcomes for postoperative graft function and complications compared with left RPLDN except for some patients who needed venous extension. These results indicate that right RPLDN could be an option for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy because of its safety and feasibility.


Session: Poster of Distinction

Program Number: P009

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search