• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Impact of Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Paradigm Shift

ANDREAS KIRIAKOPOULOS, MD, EFTHIMIOS POULIOS, MD, DIMITRIOS LINOS, MD. Department of Surgery, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece

Background: Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy substituted its laparoscopic counterpart as the treatment of choice in the management of adrenal tumors in our institution. We present our comparative results between these operative techniques showing the reasons of this change.
Patients: From May 2008 to September 2010 thirty patients (twenty one females and nine males {mean age: 50.3 yrs (21-69)} underwent posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. Operative time, complications, hospital stay, postoperative pain (based on VAS score on days 1 and 3) and cost were compared to thirty selected laparoscopic controls: twenty one females and nine males (mean age: 49.2yrs (25-64), operated between 2006 and 2008. Statistical analysis was based on [chi] 2 test.
Results: Adrenal tumors included nine adenomas associated with Cushing’s syndrome, eight adenomas associated with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome, six pheochromocytomas, four aldosteronomas, two adrenal metastases and one androgen producing tumor. Median tumor size was 4.5 cm (1.5-8.0) for the retroperitoneoscopic group and 5.0 cm (2.4-8.0) for the laparoscopic group. Median operative time was similar between the retroperitoneoscopic and the laparoscopic group {96.1min (60-165) vs 85.6min (60-120), P> 0.05}. Median operative times were significantly reduced after the 20th case {100 min (85-165) vs 70min (60-110), P<0.05}. Mean visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower for the retroperitoneoscopic group both on days 1 and 3 {0.7(0-1) vs 3.8(3-6), P<0.05 and 0.2(0-1) vs 3.2(2-6) P<0.05 respectively). Median hospital stay was also better than the laparoscopic group {2.0 days (2-3) vs 3.8 days(3-6)}. There were no complications other than three cases of lateral abdominal swelling and one case of hypoesthesia along the 12th intercostal nerve. The cost of the posterior approach was significantly less than that of the laparoscopic technique.
Conclusions: Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy was safe, fast, although vastly superior in terms of postoperative pain and hospital stay in this series. Being able to reproduce such excellent operative results along with the impressive patient recovery and the significantly reduced operative cost constituted the retroperitoneal approach the method of choice in minimally invasive adrenal surgery


Session: SS17
Program Number: S100

88

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2011 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons